On 07/31/2015 01:27 PM, Daniel Phillips wrote:
On Friday, July 31, 2015 8:37:35 AM PDT, Raymond Jennings wrote:
Returning ENOSPC when you have free space you can't yet prove is safer
than
not returning it and risking a data loss when you get hit by a
write/commit
storm. :)
Remember when
On 05/26/2015 04:22 PM, Daniel Phillips wrote:
On 05/26/2015 02:00 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
So my opinion is: Don't fork the page if page_count is elevated. You can
just wait for the IO if you need stable pages in that case. It's slow but
it's safe and it should be pretty rare. Is there any
On 05/17/2015 09:26 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
On 05/14/2015 03:59 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
On 05/14/2015 04:26 AM, Daniel Phillips wrote:
Hi Rik,
The issue is that things like ptrace, AIO, infiniband
RDMA, and other direct memory access subsystems can take
a reference to page A, which Tux3
On 05/14/2015 04:26 AM, Daniel Phillips wrote:
Hi Rik,
Our linux-tux3 tree currently currently carries this 652 line diff
against core, to make Tux3 work. This is mainly by Hirofumi, except
the fs-writeback.c hook, which is by me. The main part you may be
interested in is rmap.c, which
