On 05/13/2015 04:31 AM, Daniel Phillips wrote:
Let me be the first to catch that arithmetic error
Let's say our delta size is 400MB (typical under load) and we leave
a nice big gap of 112 MB after flushing each one. Let's say we do
two thousand of those before deciding that we have enough
On 05/13/2015 06:08 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 04:31 -0700, Daniel Phillips wrote:
Third possibility: build from our repository, as Mike did.
Sorry about that folks. I've lost all interest, it won't happen again.
Thanks for your valuable contribution. Now we are seeing
Where can I see the torture test results ?
Maybe it would be good to use Wercker ( which is free - http://wercker.com/
) to make sure we always have binaries automatically built for every new
commit.
Elifarley Cruz
Professional info: http://linkd.in/elifarley | https://github.com/elifarley
|
Am Mittwoch, 13. Mai 2015, 13:38:24 schrieb Daniel Phillips:
On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 1:25:38 PM PDT, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 13. Mai 2015, 12:37:41 schrieb Daniel Phillips:
On 05/13/2015 12:09 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote: ...
Daniel, if you want to change the process
Addendum to that post...
On 05/12/2015 10:46 AM, I wrote:
...For example, we currently
overestimate the cost of a rewrite because we would need to go poking
around in btrees to do that more accurately. Fixing that will be quite
a bit of work...
Ah no, I was wrong about that, it will not be a
Using port 80 would be easier for me, any chance of configuring Apache to
map that? Maybe I could do that for you.
And what is the URL for Tux3's Worcker page ?
Thanks!
Elifarley Cruz
Professional info: http://linkd.in/elifarley | https://github.com/elifarley
|
On 05/13/2015 07:07 AM, Elifarley Callado Coelho Cruz wrote:
Where can I see the torture test results ?
You mean, http://buildbot.tux3.org:8010/ ?
I am not as familiar with it as I should be.
Maybe it would be good to use Wercker ( which is free - http://wercker.com/ )
to make sure we
