Re: Is the project still active?

snapshot prototype, and inode container improvement. Thanks. -- OGAWA Hirofumi ___ Tux3 mailing list Tux3@phunq.net http://phunq.net/mailman/listinfo/tux3

Re: [FYI] tux3: Core changes

Jan Kara j...@suse.cz writes: On Sun 09-08-15 22:42:42, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote: Jan Kara j...@suse.cz writes: I'm not sure about which ENOSPC issue you are speaking BTW. Can you please ellaborate? 1. GUP simulate page fault, and prepare to modify 2. writeback clear dirty, and make PTE

Re: [FYI] tux3: Core changes

would not provide stabled page data for that logic too.) Well, assuming elevated refcount == threshold + waitq/wakeup, so IMO, it is not attractive. Rather the last option if there is no others as design choice. Thanks. -- OGAWA Hirofumi hirof...@mail.parknet.co.jp

Re: Trying Tux3; What am I doing wrong?

Masoud Sharbiani masoud.sharbi...@gmail.com writes: Thanks! setting selinux mode to permissive fixed this. Unto playing with sharp objects! Good. Welcome to tux3 :) -- OGAWA Hirofumi hirof...@mail.parknet.co.jp ___ Tux3 mailing list Tux3@phunq.net

Re: Trying Tux3; What am I doing wrong?

-tux3]# git checkout hirofumi Checking out files: 100% (23904/23904), done. Switched to branch 'hirofumi' [root@localhost linux-tux3]# git log commit 6548a36e52cdee6bb6095f0c97f304a2e0866790 Author: OGAWA Hirofumi hirof...@mail.parknet.co.jp Date: Sat Jun 6 18:45:08 2015 +0900 tux3: Cleanup

Re: [FYI] tux3: Core changes

. And there are more drivers in kernel like that. Unfortunately, I'm not looking those yet though. I guess those would be helpful to see the details. Thanks. -- OGAWA Hirofumi hirof...@mail.parknet.co.jp ___ Tux3 mailing list Tux3@phunq.net http://phunq.net

Re: [FYI] tux3: Core changes

different set of flags and state, so we may have to adjust revalidation. Thanks. -- OGAWA Hirofumi hirof...@mail.parknet.co.jp ___ Tux3 mailing list Tux3@phunq.net http://phunq.net/mailman/listinfo/tux3

Re: [FYI] tux3: Core changes

. Replace the page fork at (5). With no revalidate of page, (6) will use the old page. Thanks. -- OGAWA Hirofumi hirof...@mail.parknet.co.jp ___ Tux3 mailing list Tux3@phunq.net http://phunq.net/mailman/listinfo/tux3

Re: WARNING followed by splat when running rewrite test program

. [BTW, I'm trying to reproduce bug of tests/generic/299, but not succeed yet.] Signed-off-by: OGAWA Hirofumi hirof...@mail.parknet.co.jp --- fs/tux3/filemap_mmap.c |5 - mm/memory.c|2 ++ 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff -puN fs/tux3/filemap_mmap.c~page

Re: [PATCH] Optimize wait_sb_inodes()

Theodore Ts'o ty...@mit.edu writes: On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 08:37:40AM +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote: Well, anyway, it is simple. This issue was came as the performance regression when I was experimenting to use kernel bdi flusher from own flusher. The issue was sync(2) like I said

[PATCH] Optimize wait_sb_inodes()

+ 1.02% iput + 0.69% dput + 0.57% __tux3_get_block + 0.53% shrink_dcache_parent + 0.53% __d_instantiate Before patch: real 2m40.994s user 0m1.344s sys 0m15.832s After patch: real 2m34.748 user 0m1.360s sys 0m5.356s Signed-off-by: OGAWA Hirofumi hirof

Re: [PATCH] Optimize wait_sb_inodes()

-of-tree code is not the way things get done around here... I'm thinking the root cause is vfs can't have knowledge of FS internal, e.g. FS is handling data transactional way, or not. Thanks. -- OGAWA Hirofumi hirof...@mail.parknet.co.jp ___ Tux3

Re: Tested the flusher slightly

] -- OGAWA Hirofumi hirof...@mail.parknet.co.jp ___ Tux3 mailing list Tux3@phunq.net http://phunq.net/mailman/listinfo/tux3

Re: Draft to optimize wait_sb_indoes()

Raymond Jennings shent...@gmail.com writes: Also I think it's spelled inodes, not indoes Oh, I'll fix. Thanks. -- OGAWA Hirofumi hirof...@mail.parknet.co.jp ___ Tux3 mailing list Tux3@phunq.net http://phunq.net/mailman/listinfo/tux3