On 03/19/2013 06:00:32 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Am Dienstag, 29. Januar 2013 schrieb Daniel Phillips:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Theodore Ts'o ty...@mit.edu
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 04:20:11PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 03:27:38PM -0800, David
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote:
I'm confused, http://tux3.org/ lists a bunch of dates from 5 years ago, then
nothing. Is this project dead or not?
Not. We haven't done much about updating tux3.org lately, however you
will find plenty of activity here:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Am Dienstag, 29. Januar 2013 schrieb Daniel Phillips:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Theodore Ts'o ty...@mit.edu wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 04:20:11PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 03:27:38PM -0800, David Lang
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 9:04 PM, David Lang da...@lang.hm wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Am Dienstag, 29. Januar 2013 schrieb Daniel Phillips:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Theodore Ts'o ty...@mit.edu wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 04:20:11PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 10:13:37PM -0800, Daniel Phillips wrote:
The thing that jumps out at me with this is the question of how you will
avoid the 'filesystem image in a file' disaster that reiserfs had (where
it's fsck could mix up metadata chunks from the main filesystem with
metadata
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 03:27:38PM -0800, David Lang wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 10:13:37PM -0800, Daniel Phillips wrote:
The thing that jumps out at me with this is the question of how you will
avoid the 'filesystem image in a file' disaster that
