Re: poke?

dedup support is awesome. Don't forget to refcount and hash though. Also, don't use hashes as indexes, else collision attack On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Kyle Sanderson wrote: > XFS is our only hope, it looks like dedup support is coming soon with the > new on-disk

Re: poke?

Are you also aware of the tux3.org SERVFAIL errors I've been getting recently from DNS? On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:57 PM, Daniel Phillips < daniel.raymond.phill...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the pokes guys. Tux3 was only resting. I am doing some work > on Shardmap at the moment, so we should

Re: poke?

Thanks for the pokes guys. Tux3 was only resting. I am doing some work on Shardmap at the moment, so we should be able to see some interesting results for directory scalability from that. Hirofumi is busy updating the tree to current upstream kernel. Regards, Daniel On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 9:22

Re: poke?

XFS is our only hope, it looks like dedup support is coming soon with the new on-disk format. On 9 Dec 2016 1:19 pm, "Raymond Jennings" wrote: > Hey, is this project alive? I've been a big fan ever since I heard of it > and we need something to beat the pants off of btrfs.

poke?

Hey, is this project alive? I've been a big fan ever since I heard of it and we need something to beat the pants off of btrfs. ___ Tux3 mailing list Tux3@phunq.net http://phunq.net/mailman/listinfo/tux3