Bill Kendrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In other words... split up the stamps into collections of
10-20 each, rather than load all 200 up at once.
Yes. For the next release! The default stamp package is getting
much to big.
--
Karl Ove Hufthammer
On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 20:49, Bill Kendrick wrote:
I think it's fine to keep 'everything' in memory, but to continue with
my original plan on managing just WHAT 'everything' is.
In other words... split up the stamps into collections of 10-20 each,
rather than load all 200 up at once.
I don't know where it's all going, but --nostamps reduces
memory usage by 75%. I'm at about 60 MB.
Plan?
Things that I think should be kept in memory:
a. sounds for all stamps visible in the selector
b. image data for the active stamp
c. icons for all stamps visible in the selector
d. icons for
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 06:43:40PM -0500, Albert Cahalan wrote:
I don't know where it's all going, but --nostamps reduces
memory usage by 75%. I'm at about 60 MB.
Plan?
Things that I think should be kept in memory:
a. sounds for all stamps visible in the selector
b. image data for the
