M-D November, to moi:
>
> I get that. What I was asking was how your post re: Jessie Palmer/ESPN
> relates to the Clarkson/Daily Mail discussion.
Well, as with lots of other shows, he'll be the face of it.
And again, Clarkson already is a topic on the website/in the paper.
Let it go.
B
I get that. What I was asking was how your post re: Jessie Palmer/ESPN relates
to the Clarkson/Daily Mail discussion.
--
--
TV or Not TV The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send
M-D November, to moi:
>
> What does this have to do with Jeremy Clarkson and/or the reliability of
> the Daily Mail?
Clarkson will almost certainly be at least a monthly, if not more
frequently, topic for DailyMailTV.
The Mail openly endorses and blesses
What does this have to do with Jeremy Clarkson and/or the reliability of the
Daily Mail?
--
--
TV or Not TV The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to
Mark Jeffries, to M-D November:
>
> A reminder that the Daily Mail is not the most trustworthy source of news
> anywhere in the world, even if Dr. Phil's producing its TV version starting
> next month. :)
>
>
> PseudoBristology: Ex-"Bachelor" Jesse Palmer is being lent from ESPN
Sure. Here’s a more reliable source.
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-40842314
--
--
TV or Not TV The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to tvornottv@googlegroups.com
To
A reminder that the Daily Mail is not the most trustworthy source of news
anywhere in the world, even if Dr. Phil's producing its TV version starting
next month. :)
Mark Jeffries
Saints Spotlight Editor
spotligh...@gmail.com
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 6:19 PM, M-D November