Waqar Khan writes:
> But, is the above way of using dictionary as cache correct? Or is
> there a "deffered" way of doing this? All I want is an inmemory cache
> that is compatible with this async paradigm?
Yes, it is fine to use a single dict as a cache. Twisted is
single-threaded an so only
Hi all,
Here is async in-memory cache that I've implemented for one of my projects:
https://gist.github.com/IlyaSkriblovsky/5aba53b661acd49b65efeb4ce41a8b52
It properly handles problem #2 described by Maarten. But it doesn't
bother with eviction because it wasn't needed at the time of writing
