Re: [Twisted-Python] _Win32Waker

2009-04-21 Thread Aron Bierbaum
Sorry, forgot to attach the C++ example. -Aron On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Aron Bierbaum wrote: > I have been able to reproduce the same results with a simple C++ > example. I have been unable to find any specific reason why binding to > "127.0.0.1" and later callin

Re: [Twisted-Python] _Win32Waker

2009-04-21 Thread Aron Bierbaum
ockname()) to client.connect(('127.0.0.1', server.getsockname()[1])) On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Jean-Paul Calderone wrote: > On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:16:39 -0500, Aron Bierbaum > wrote: >> >> I have looked into this a little more and have noticed that if I >>

Re: [Twisted-Python] _Win32Waker

2009-04-20 Thread Aron Bierbaum
his in the next couple of days. -Aron On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Jean-Paul Calderone wrote: > On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 09:17:14 -0500, Aron Bierbaum > wrote: >> >> I have been unable to reproduce this problem on multiple machines that >> I have tested on. Also I have

Re: [Twisted-Python] _Win32Waker

2009-03-09 Thread Aron Bierbaum
wrote: > On Thu, 5 Mar 2009 16:49:15 -0600, Aron Bierbaum > wrote: >> >> I have been using a custom Qt4 reactor that derives from >> PosixReactorBase. As a result it creates a _Win32Waker to allow >> threads and signals to wake up the IO thread. It seems though that the

[Twisted-Python] _Win32Waker

2009-03-05 Thread Aron Bierbaum
I have been using a custom Qt4 reactor that derives from PosixReactorBase. As a result it creates a _Win32Waker to allow threads and signals to wake up the IO thread. It seems though that the current implementation only works about half of the time. The other half it exists with : File "...\Lib\