Hi Juan,
You could try:
print reactor.__class__
This should allow you to check that the twistd command-line argument is
working. Example:
luke@pow:~$ twistd -noy foo.py |head -n 1
luke@pow:~$ twistd -r poll -noy foo.py |head -n 1
Can you not do a:
from twisted.python import log
from twisted.internet import reactor
log.msg('My reactor is: %r' % repr(reactor))
somewhere in your code to determine it?
Are you running your application with twistd? You can pass a reactor
implementation via the '-r' option.
Reza
2011/5/19 Jua
Is there any way to check if it is using the the poll/epoll reactor?
Regards
2011/4/26 Luke Marsden
> On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 17:42 +0200, Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum wrote:
> > Hello!
> >I have a Linux box serving my twisted app. All works ok except
> > after some days running (where I can
2011/5/10 Itamar Turner-Trauring
> > Still having problems...
> >
> > I can see that twistd process has a higher number than 1024 looking at
> > /proc/pid/limits but whe 1024 descriptors number gets reached the system
> > becomes unstable. It also has been launche using '-r epoll' option. Any
> >
> Still having problems...
>
> I can see that twistd process has a higher number than 1024 looking at
> /proc/pid/limits but whe 1024 descriptors number gets reached the system
> becomes unstable. It also has been launche using '-r epoll' option. Any
> other idea?
0. What does "unstable" mean?
1.
Hmm, are you running your process as root? If so, you may need to add
the following two lines in /etc/security/limits.conf:
root soft nofile 99
root hard nofile 99
(yes, root, even though you previously supplied '*').
I'd also reboot just to be sure. If you
Still having problems...
I can see that twistd process has a higher number than 1024 looking at
/proc/pid/limits but whe 1024 descriptors number gets reached the system
becomes unstable. It also has been launche using '-r epoll' option. Any
other idea?
2011/5/5 Reza Lotun
> 2011/5/5 Juan Anto
+1
Perfect explanation. Thank you very much!
2011/5/8 Reza Lotun
> Hi Juan,
>
> 2011/5/8 Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum
>
>> MUST I apply that change or may be I SHOULD do it? Why is it necessary?
>
>
> Each network connection on your system is represented by a 'file
> descriptor', in Unix termi
Hi Juan,
2011/5/8 Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum
> MUST I apply that change or may be I SHOULD do it? Why is it necessary?
Each network connection on your system is represented by a 'file
descriptor', in Unix terminology. By default, there is a limit on the number
of open file descriptors that c
MUST I apply that change or may be I SHOULD do it? Why is it necessary?
Regards
2011/5/6 Reza Lotun
> Small addition - I forgot to say to open /etc/security/limits.conf and then
> place the following two lines in step 3 in:
>
> 3. Place the following two lines:
>> * softnofile 99
Small addition - I forgot to say to open /etc/security/limits.conf and then
place the following two lines in step 3 in:
3. Place the following two lines:
> * softnofile 99
> * hardnofile 99
> Either reboot, or also type in `ulimit -n 99`
>
Also, I'd be ha
Thank you Reza!
2011/5/5 Reza Lotun
> 2011/5/5 Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum
>
>> I had got the same problem using '-r epoll' options when starting the app
>> via twistd... When 1024 descriptors are opened, I can see 100% CPU.
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
>>
> 1. Edit /etc/sysctl.conf and place the follo
On May 5, 2011, at 10:52 AM, Reza Lotun wrote:
> 2011/5/5 Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum
> I had got the same problem using '-r epoll' options when starting the app via
> twistd... When 1024 descriptors are opened, I can see 100% CPU.
>
> Any ideas?
>
>
> 1. Edit /etc/sysctl.conf and place th
2011/5/5 Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum
> I had got the same problem using '-r epoll' options when starting the app
> via twistd... When 1024 descriptors are opened, I can see 100% CPU.
>
> Any ideas?
>
>
1. Edit /etc/sysctl.conf and place the following line there:
fs.file-max = 99
2. Ty
I had got the same problem using '-r epoll' options when starting the app
via twistd... When 1024 descriptors are opened, I can see 100% CPU.
Any ideas?
2011/4/26 Luke Marsden
> On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 17:42 +0200, Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum wrote:
> > Hello!
> >I have a Linux box serving m
No. It's recommended to fix bugs in Twisted that affect you :). Well, that too.
:}
___
Twisted-Python mailing list
Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com
http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
Thank you very much for your tip Patrick!
2011/4/27 Patrick Mylund Nielsen
> That is sufficient, yes.
>
> You might even want to make that 'epoll' since it scales better than
> poll (assuming you're running on Linux 2.6+ only)
>
> Best,
> Patrick
>
> 2011/4/27 Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum :
> >
That is sufficient, yes.
You might even want to make that 'epoll' since it scales better than
poll (assuming you're running on Linux 2.6+ only)
Best,
Patrick
2011/4/27 Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum :
> Must I make any change appart from start the app with twistd plus '-r poll'?
>
> 2011/4/27 Luke
Must I make any change appart from start the app with twistd plus '-r poll'?
2011/4/27 Luke Marsden
> >> 2011/4/26 Luke Marsden
> >> You can also switch to using the "poll" reactor
>
> On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 08:01 +0200, Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum wrote:
> > Is that the unique way to get mor t
>> 2011/4/26 Luke Marsden
>> You can also switch to using the "poll" reactor
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 08:01 +0200, Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum wrote:
> Is that the unique way to get mor than 1024 simultaneous connections?
>
>
> Regads
>
On Linux and BSD, yes. See
http://twistedmatrix.com/docume
Is that the unique way to get mor than 1024 simultaneous connections?
Regads
2011/4/26 Luke Marsden
> On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 17:42 +0200, Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum wrote:
> > Hello!
> >I have a Linux box serving my twisted app. All works ok except
> > after some days running (where I can
On Apr 26, 2011, at 4:34 PM, Ray Cote wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Luke Marsden"
>> To: "Twisted general discussion"
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 2:08:40 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Twisted-Python] 100% CPU on high opened descrip
- Original Message -
> From: "Luke Marsden"
> To: "Twisted general discussion"
> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 2:08:40 PM
> Subject: Re: [Twisted-Python] 100% CPU on high opened descriptors
> On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 17:42 +0200, Juan Antonio Ibañez Santo
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 17:42 +0200, Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum wrote:
> Hello!
>I have a Linux box serving my twisted app. All works ok except
> after some days running (where I can see my CPU going to 100%). I saw
> that CPU goes 100% usage when the app reaches to 1024 opened
> descriptors (s
On Apr 26, 2011, at 11:42 AM, Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum wrote:
>I have a Linux box serving my twisted app. All works ok except after some
> days running (where I can see my CPU going to 100%). I saw that CPU goes 100%
> usage when the app reaches to 1024 opened descriptors (sockets). It s
Hello!
I have a Linux box serving my twisted app. All works ok except after some
days running (where I can see my CPU going to 100%). I saw that CPU goes
100% usage when the app reaches to 1024 opened descriptors (sockets). It
seems TM isn't closing some connections when clients loose connectio
26 matches
Mail list logo
