And just to be clear, yes, it fixes my bug too.
Peter.
On Wed, 16 Jun 2021, at 12:30, Peter Westlake wrote:
> Works a treat! Thank you!
>
> Peter.
>
> On Tue, 15 Jun 2021, at 18:51, Tom Most wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 15, 2021, at 2:46 AM, Peter Westlake wrote:
> > > On Tue, 15 Jun 2021, at 01:58,
Works a treat! Thank you!
Peter.
On Tue, 15 Jun 2021, at 18:51, Tom Most wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021, at 2:46 AM, Peter Westlake wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Jun 2021, at 01:58, Wim Lewis wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 05:25:42PM +0100, Peter Westlake wrote:
> > > > Do we have any idea when the
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021, at 2:46 AM, Peter Westlake wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jun 2021, at 01:58, Wim Lewis wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 05:25:42PM +0100, Peter Westlake wrote:
> > > Do we have any idea when the fix for "RecursionError with synchronous
> > > deferreds (#1549)" will appear in a
On Tue, 15 Jun 2021, at 01:58, Wim Lewis wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 05:25:42PM +0100, Peter Westlake wrote:
> > Do we have any idea when the fix for "RecursionError with synchronous
> > deferreds (#1549)" will appear in a release?
>
> It's been merged to trunk, so it'll be in the next
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 05:25:42PM +0100, Peter Westlake wrote:
> Do we have any idea when the fix for "RecursionError with synchronous
> deferreds (#1549)" will appear in a release?
It's been merged to trunk, so it'll be in the next release... whenever
that is. Twisted tends to release about
Hello Twisted team,
Do we have any idea when the fix for "RecursionError with synchronous deferreds
(#1549)" will appear in a release?
Peter.___
Twisted-Python mailing list
Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com
On Wed, 17 Mar 2021, at 02:50, Glyph wrote:
>
>> Excellent, thank you!
>>
>> I think I understand how it works, but one thing puzzles me: how does the
>> queue in the jump() function ever get longer than one element? Is it because
>> it might contain a recursive call, which is activated by the
> On Mar 16, 2021, at 4:20 AM, Peter Westlake wrote:
>
> On Sun, 14 Mar 2021, at 02:08, Glyph wrote:
>>
>> I did indeed have a half-finished experiment to fix this. The fix is now
>> finished and in review here:
>> https://twistedmatrix.com/trac/ticket/10125#comment:1
>>
On Sun, 14 Mar 2021, at 02:08, Glyph wrote:
>
> I did indeed have a half-finished experiment to fix this. The fix is now
> finished and in review here:
> https://twistedmatrix.com/trac/ticket/10125#comment:1 .
>
> If you could review it thoroughly enough, I could land it.
Excellent, thank
> On Mar 11, 2021, at 4:12 AM, Peter Westlake wrote:
>
> On Wed, 10 Mar 2021, at 23:11, Glyph wrote:
>>
>> Would you mind filing a ticket in trac, or digging one up if you can
>> find it? This problem rings a bell, and I think I might actually have
>> some code for this lying around
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021, at 23:11, Glyph wrote:
>
> Would you mind filing a ticket in trac, or digging one up if you can
> find it? This problem rings a bell, and I think I might actually have
> some code for this lying around somewhere already.
Here is it:
> On Mar 10, 2021, at 3:09 AM, Peter Westlake wrote:
>
> On Tue, 9 Mar 2021, at 19:28, Glyph wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 9, 2021, at 4:54 AM, Peter Westlake wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm getting a "maximum recursion depth exceeded" error that appears to be
>>> coming from flatten(). The odd thing is
On Tue, 9 Mar 2021, at 19:28, Glyph wrote:
>
>
> > On Mar 9, 2021, at 4:54 AM, Peter Westlake wrote:
> >
> > I'm getting a "maximum recursion depth exceeded" error that appears to be
> > coming from flatten(). The odd thing is that it only happens sometimes. The
> > HTML that's being
On Tue, 9 Mar 2021, at 19:28, Glyph wrote:
>
>
> > On Mar 9, 2021, at 4:54 AM, Peter Westlake wrote:
> >
> > I'm getting a "maximum recursion depth exceeded" error that appears to be
> > coming from flatten(). The odd thing is that it only happens sometimes.
>
> flatten() can definitely
> On Mar 9, 2021, at 4:54 AM, Peter Westlake wrote:
>
> I'm getting a "maximum recursion depth exceeded" error that appears to be
> coming from flatten(). The odd thing is that it only happens sometimes. The
> HTML that's being flattened does have a few Deferreds in it. Those come from
>
I'm getting a "maximum recursion depth exceeded" error that appears to be
coming from flatten(). The odd thing is that it only happens sometimes. The
HTML that's being flattened does have a few Deferreds in it. Those come from
function calls, which cache the results, which might explain why I
16 matches
Mail list logo
