Re: [Twisted-Python] eliminating MSI builder

2016-09-08 Thread Adi Roiban
On 8 September 2016 at 03:16, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote: > > On Sep 7, 2016, at 6:49 PM, Amber Brown wrote: > > They actually build wheels now (lol), the builder having some upgrades has > meant that the whl has a different name (cp27-cp27m, not

Re: [Twisted-Python] eliminating MSI builder

2016-09-07 Thread Glyph Lefkowitz
> On Sep 7, 2016, at 6:49 PM, Amber Brown wrote: > > They actually build wheels now (lol), the builder having some upgrades has > meant that the whl has a different name (cp27-cp27m, not cp27-none). I > noticed it last night, just went to bed before I fixed it :) >

Re: [Twisted-Python] eliminating MSI builder

2016-09-07 Thread Amber Brown
They actually build wheels now (lol), the builder having some upgrades has meant that the whl has a different name (cp27-cp27m, not cp27-none). I noticed it last night, just went to bed before I fixed it :) On 8 Sep 2016 9:19 AM, "Glyph Lefkowitz" wrote: > I think MSIs

[Twisted-Python] eliminating MSI builder

2016-09-07 Thread Glyph Lefkowitz
I think MSIs are generally a bad way to distribute Python libraries. We are still building them for some reason, and the builder has a bad recent track record of build failures: https://buildbot.twistedmatrix.com/builders/windows7-64-py2.7-msi Is there any reason we shouldn't get rid of this?