> On Oct 12, 2016, at 7:35 PM, Tom Prince wrote:
>
> Thinking about it some more, there isn't currently any endpoint descriptions
> that have an empty name, so we could have a entirely new syntax that starts
> with `:`. If we went in that direction, we'd definitely want to think about
> futur
> we can just look up until the first ':'; we just need to define a new
interface for a new syntax.
What do you think of adding a special argument for endpoint strings called
"wraps" or "pipe" that tells the parser to recombine the right-hand side
and send it back through the parser? For example:
> This applies more generally; no need for any weird hacks. Any 'new'
plugin could just opt in to a different syntax; we can just look up until
the first ':'; we just need to define a new interface for a new syntax.
I don't think that this provides a good user experience.
1) There are existing e
> On Oct 13, 2016, at 12:47 PM, Tom Prince wrote:
>
> > This applies more generally; no need for any weird hacks. Any 'new' plugin
> > could just opt in to a different syntax; we can just look up until the
> > first ':'; we just need to define a new interface for a new syntax.
>
> I don't th
