I like that annotations will be open so that the various schema can
live/die organically based on client adoption (or lack thereof) rather
than an artificially-emposed constraint.
I outlined some of my ideas for annotations (or Twitterformats, as I
called them) at the end of last year at
Hey everyone. One of the things we talked about at Chirp is the new
Annotations feature we're working on. In short, it allows you to annotate a
tweet with structured metadata. We're still working on Annotations, but I
wanted to share with a wider audience beyond those I was able to talk to in
awesome idea! I know I can find a use for it. Some concerns, however,
below...
Joseph Cheek
Marcel Molina wrote:
the sentence
Namespaces aren't intended as a way for people to claim their little
slice of the tweet space.
and the sentence
If you want a given key to mean one thing and
