Dewald,
These rules apply to third party apps. @twittersuggests is not a third
party app, but an experimental feature, developed and owned by
Twitter.
Now I can also understand this Do as I Say, not as I Do situation
can be irritating. But I guess the best thing to do at this point is
probably
It's an @reply spambot, pure and simple. There is no vetting of
suggested users - it didn't take either me or Marshall Kirkpatrick
long to find a tweeter that was not safe for work in @twittersuggests'
stream.
It's a bad idea - Twitter needs to quit screwing around with stuff
like this and solve
Arnaud,
Know what I totally cannot understand? Why is it that Twitter, through
various spokespersons, continually reinforces the impression that they
pay scant lip service to the alleged notion that they value the third
party developer ecosystem?
Under any circumstances, Do as I say, not as I
...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [twitter-dev] Re: At Reply Spam
It's an @reply spambot, pure and simple. There is no vetting of
suggested users - it didn't take either me or Marshall Kirkpatrick
long to find a tweeter that was not safe for work in @twittersuggests'
stream.
It's a bad idea - Twitter needs
Arnaud,
That's comforting to know. With that being the case, can you please
enlighten us as to why Twitter is apparently violating its own rules,
which, as you said, are still in force and we all still are apparently
expected to adhere to?
Let me help you and quote from your rules the
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Dewald Pretorius dpr...@gmail.com wrote:
If not, then you may have de facto invalidated that section of your
rules and by implication exempted all developers and applications from
it.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
Um… Yeah.
Here's the
+1
It is Twitter's ball.
On 5 May 2011, at 20:04, TjL wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Dewald Pretorius dpr...@gmail.com wrote:
If not, then you may have de facto invalidated that section of your
rules and by implication exempted all developers and applications from
it.
