On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Chad Etzel wrote:
>
> Hi Matt,
>
> When you decide on the final format and deploy, will you let us know,
> please? I'm leaving my email filters in limbo until then.
I've dealt with this by leaving my old filters in place. If Twitter
switches back to something o
You do a ton of great things, Matt. We all make mistakes, but you and
the rest of the crew there do a bang-up job.
--
Ed Finkler
http://funkatron.com
Twitter:@funkatron
AIM: funka7ron
ICQ: 3922133
XMPP:funkat...@gmail.com
On May 7, 11:24 am, Matt Sanford wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I left last n
Hi all,
I left last night while they were rolling this back to the old
long format addresses. Re-reading the logs this morning it seems like
there was some sort of problem and it was rolled back. Waiting for the
engineer in question so I can find out more details but based on what
I'
Hi Matt,
When you decide on the final format and deploy, will you let us know,
please? I'm leaving my email filters in limbo until then.
Thanks,
-Chad
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 12:59 AM, TjL wrote:
>
> *sigh*
>
> Seriously? I've already started telling people to change their filters
> and now th
*sigh*
Seriously? I've already started telling people to change their filters
and now they're going to break *again*.
This is why daddy drinks.
All kidding aside, I don't understand how a change like this gets
pushed out without the left hand knowing WTF the right hand is doing —
which is what
It seems John and I cannot help but write mails at the same time :)
— Matt
On May 6, 2009, at 3:54 PM, John Adams wrote:
nore...@twitter.com isn't the best choice because many mailers on
the Internet refuse to acknowledge Errors-To: headers.
Right now, because there is little industry co
Hi all,
The change in from address was meant to fix the 'allow images'
but in the process broke some ISP spam filters, some spam reporting,
and a great many people's mail filters. We're working on rolling that
back now. Sorry for the disruption.
Thanks;
– Matt Sanford / @mzsanford
nore...@twitter.com isn't the best choice because many mailers on the
Internet refuse to acknowledge Errors-To: headers.
Right now, because there is little industry consensus on how to
properly handle a bounce (aside from send a message back to the Return-
Path:) our VERP methodology on ad
Don't touch that dial …
We're (John and I) discussing bounce processing and spam
detection and may have to revert the from address change to help with
people's spam filters. I'll update once I know more.
Thanks;
– Matt Sanford / @mzsanford
Twitter Dev
On May 6, 2009, at 3:13 PM,
FWIW I think "nore...@twitter.com" is the right choice, it's certainly
a lot easier for image display, etc.
But it sounds like John Adams thinks this is going to change back. I
hope this will be clarified.
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Matt Sanford wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> We had changed
Hi there,
We had changed the from address to try and improve bounce
reporting and prevent being marked as spam by major ISPs. When we
added the HTML formatting we found that we needed a consistent address
for the 'always display images' option in many clients so we changed
things aro
This is a bug introduced in the last deploy. We've all agreed on the
VERP format,
twitter-follow-emailname=domain@postmaster.twitter.com
I'll follow up with engineering and file a bug. Sorry about this.
-john
On May 6, 2009, at 2:53 PM, TjL wrote:
The email notifications for new fol
12 matches
Mail list logo
