Chad Etzel c...@twitter.com wrote:
After discussing this internally, we have decided that we will make
thecrossdomain.xml policy more open on the api.twitter.com domain. We
don't know exactly what that entails yet or when it will go into
effect, but this is something that we want to open up.
Dossy, don't make me come over there and beat you with an Actionscript
book. so help me...
On Oct 27, 2:40 am, Dossy Shiobara do...@panoptic.com wrote:
Bah, who seriously develops applications using Flash, anyway?
:-P
(For those who don't know, Wez and I are friends ...)
On 10/26/09 6:09
I thought all you click-and-draggers were waiting for Adobe Twitter CS5.
On 10/30/09 11:50 AM, Wez Crozier wrote:
Dossy, don't make me come over there and beat you with an Actionscript
book. so help me...
On Oct 27, 2:40 am, Dossy Shiobara do...@panoptic.com wrote:
Bah, who seriously
Glad to hear it. If you need advice from the Flash community, there
are lots of folks who could help.
On Oct 29, 12:17 pm, Chad Etzel c...@twitter.com wrote:
Hello,
After discussing this internally, we have decided that we will make
the crossdomain.xml policy more open on the api.twitter.com
Can someone from the API team please comment on this?
On Oct 21, 1:31 pm, orian orianm...@gmail.com wrote:
Now that api.twitter.com has gone live, can we please have a less
restrictive crossdomain.xml so that Flash apps can access the API
without requiring the use of a proxy? This was being
Hello,
After discussing this internally, we have decided that we will make
the crossdomain.xml policy more open on the api.twitter.com domain. We
don't know exactly what that entails yet or when it will go into
effect, but this is something that we want to open up.
Expect another post when
+1
If that's not possible, it will be interesting an update about the
reasons still blocking the more permissive crossdomain.xml ;)
On Oct 21, 6:31 pm, orian orianm...@gmail.com wrote:
Now that api.twitter.com has gone live, can we please have a less
restrictive crossdomain.xml so that Flash
Bah, who seriously develops applications using Flash, anyway?
:-P
(For those who don't know, Wez and I are friends ...)
On 10/26/09 6:09 PM, Wez Crozier wrote:
I'm gonna have to bump this fellas! +1 here and I know a dozen other
flash devs in the UK that would like a less restrictive
Seriously. I'm no Flash developer, but I know more than a few Flash/
Flex developers just dying to get some pretty impressive apps out
there. Right now, they're pretty much hamstrung by this limitation.
On Oct 21, 1:31 pm, orian orianm...@gmail.com wrote:
Now that api.twitter.com has gone live,
+1 !
This could really enable some awesome web clients for Twitter.
On Oct 21, 1:31 pm, orian orianm...@gmail.com wrote:
Now that api.twitter.com has gone live, can we please have a less
restrictive crossdomain.xml so that Flash apps can access the API
without requiring the use of a proxy?
Is this planned already? Please do something about this, using a proxy
is a sloppy way of just communicating with the API directly.
-Pete
On Oct 21, 1:31 pm, orian orianm...@gmail.com wrote:
Now that api.twitter.com has gone live, can we please have a less
restrictive crossdomain.xml so that
11 matches
Mail list logo
