I would have to agree with mat. But to each their own. The return
codes frequently make no sense from twitter, so i guess the fact that
it doesn't make sense it is irrelevant, so long as it is consistent.
On Dec 3, 6:29 pm, mat mat.st...@gmail.com wrote:
Given that 400 is bad request, and the
Given that 400 is bad request, and the client SHOULD NOT repeat the
request without modifications (w3.org's emphasis), and 503 means
service unavailable, try again later, and can include a retry-after
header, would it not have made more sense to change the response code
of the REST API to the more
