Nice! I didn't realize the intent page had the "related" and "via"
parameters! Great compromise between the aforementioned 2 options.
Thanks guys!
--
Twitter developer documentation and resources: http://dev.twitter.com/doc
API updates via Twitter: http://twitter.com/twitterapi
Issues/Enhancement
As Tom said, you should use web intents if you're looking for a simple
"tweet link". It's really easy to implement, it doesn't require javascript,
and it's mobile friendly. Oh, and you can also use the "related" and "via"
parameters (if you like Tweet Button's suggested account system).
More info
Afaik Twitter is trying to get people to stop using /home?status=. You
should use either /share or /intent.
However: /share simply redirects to /intent. I'd definitely go with
/intent/tweet because it allows more customization than /share. I
definitely wouldn't use /home?status=.
Tom
On 4/
Yup. That's another way. Is that your preferred way? And if so why?
--
Twitter developer documentation and resources: http://dev.twitter.com/doc
API updates via Twitter: http://twitter.com/twitterapi
Issues/Enhancements Tracker: http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/list
Change your members
