That value looks like bogus data. That tweet is from @biz, a Twitter
co-founder. You can do anything you want when you are co-founder -- like
setting in_reply_to_status_id's equal to 0.
Doug Williams
Twitter API Support
http://twitter.com/dougw
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Joshua Perry
Seriously! Take his MySQL access away.
Doug Williams wrote:
That value looks like bogus data. That tweet is from @biz, a Twitter
co-founder. You can do anything you want when you are co-founder --
like setting in_reply_to_status_id's equal to 0.
Doug Williams
Twitter API Support
couldn't this actually happen a lot though, if you wrote an app and were
passing in this value and the value got dropped? or does the system ignore
this?
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Joshua Perry j...@6bit.com wrote:
Seriously! Take his MySQL access away.
Doug Williams wrote:
That
Peter,
As was described here [1], invalid in_reply_to_status_id's are no longer
accepted. We now verify the status_id is valid and that the author is being
mentioned. Otherwise the parameter is ignored.
1.
Solution: Create a status with id = 0.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:51, Doug Williams d...@twitter.com wrote:
Peter,
As was described here [1], invalid in_reply_to_status_id's are no longer
accepted. We now verify the status_id is valid and that the author is being
mentioned. Otherwise the
