Re: simple "tweet this" implementation

2008-12-24 Thread Alex Payne
I've got a fix for it, should go live Monday. On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 21:40, scottjgo wrote: > > Seems like it's still not working. Any update? > > To reproduce try: http://i2ft.com/znd and click the little twitter "t" > in the frame. When it posts to the site, it still shows "from web" > > On D

Re: simple "tweet this" implementation

2008-12-23 Thread scottjgo
Seems like it's still not working. Any update? To reproduce try: http://i2ft.com/znd and click the little twitter "t" in the frame. When it posts to the site, it still shows "from web" On Dec 13, 5:42 pm, "Alex Payne" wrote: > Nope, we'll investigate it this coming week.  Hang tight! > > > > On

Re: simple "tweet this" implementation

2008-12-13 Thread Alex Payne
Nope, we'll investigate it this coming week. Hang tight! On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 12:29, scottjgo wrote: > > Alex- > > I posted a follow-up on the bug for this feature -- would it be better > for me to open a new bug? > > On Dec 13, 3:12 pm, "Alex Payne" wrote: >> Indeed, anybody can randomly f

Re: simple "tweet this" implementation

2008-12-13 Thread scottjgo
Alex- I posted a follow-up on the bug for this feature -- would it be better for me to open a new bug? On Dec 13, 3:12 pm, "Alex Payne" wrote: > Indeed, anybody can randomly fill in any source.  The incentive for > faking requests from a particular application is so low that we don't > put any

Re: simple "tweet this" implementation

2008-12-13 Thread Alex Payne
Indeed, anybody can randomly fill in any source. The incentive for faking requests from a particular application is so low that we don't put any protections in place. On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 09:32, Abraham Williams <4bra...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is it maybe tied into the referrer so it only works

Re: simple "tweet this" implementation

2008-12-13 Thread Abraham Williams
Is it maybe tied into the referrer so it only works coming from the website that is supposed to have the source? I find it unlikely that anybody can randomly fill in any source. On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 09:58, Dharmesh wrote: > > I have not been able to get this to work yet (i.e. passing a valid

Re: simple "tweet this" implementation

2008-12-13 Thread Dharmesh
I have not been able to get this to work yet (i.e. passing a valid source= parameter still shows updates as being from the web). Example: http://twitter.com/home?status=Testing&source=TwitterGrader Thanks. -Dharmesh On Dec 12, 12:32 pm, scottjgo wrote: > Has anyone gotten it to work? Am I doi

Re: simple "tweet this" implementation

2008-12-12 Thread scottjgo
Has anyone gotten it to work? Am I doing something wrong? On Dec 12, 12:20 pm, "Alex Payne" wrote: > The feature has been deployed... > > > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 18:16, scottjgo wrote: > > > Hi. > > > I guess this feature was added a week ago. Thanks! > > > I'm having a bit of trouble with

Re: simple "tweet this" implementation

2008-12-12 Thread Alex Payne
The feature has been deployed... On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 18:16, scottjgo wrote: > > Hi. > > I guess this feature was added a week ago. Thanks! > > I'm having a bit of trouble with it though. I tried the url > http://twitter.com/home?status=test&source=isitfunnytodaycom (my > source paramter was

Re: simple "tweet this" implementation

2008-12-11 Thread scottjgo
Hi. I guess this feature was added a week ago. Thanks! I'm having a bit of trouble with it though. I tried the url http://twitter.com/home?status=test&source=isitfunnytodaycom (my source paramter was approved over 48 hours ago) and my post is still 'from web'. I also tried using the source param

Re: simple "tweet this" implementation

2008-11-21 Thread scottjgo
http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/detail?id=163 On Nov 21, 2:51 pm, "Alex Payne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We recently had another request to allow messages posted from the web > to define their own source parameters.  We'll consider it.  Please > file an issue athttp://code.google.c

Re: simple "tweet this" implementation

2008-11-21 Thread Alex Payne
We recently had another request to allow messages posted from the web to define their own source parameters. We'll consider it. Please file an issue at http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/entry. On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 01:36, scottjgo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Bummer. > > I don't s

Re: simple "tweet this" implementation

2008-11-21 Thread scottjgo
Bummer. I don't suppose you'd be willing to add a simple &appid= or something to the url that lets you modify the posted from link (given that the link was already approved for your app id)? On Nov 20, 5:03 pm, Alex Payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, you'll need to make a proper API request

Re: simple "tweet this" implementation

2008-11-21 Thread Chris Thomson
Not all Twitter clients show the "from application" text, so it's probably a better idea to just enter the link with the status (and no, you can't modify the "from web" link when posting from the twitter.com interface). —— Chris Thomson http://twitter.com/chris24 On 20-Nov-08, at 1:05 PM,

Re: simple "tweet this" implementation

2008-11-20 Thread Alex Payne
Yes, you'll need to make a proper API request to have your update attributed. -- Alex Payne On Nov 20, 2008, at 10:05, scottjgo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi. I want to add a "tweet this" link to my website. The idea is that you would click the button, and it would prepopulate the messag

simple "tweet this" implementation

2008-11-20 Thread scottjgo
Hi. I want to add a "tweet this" link to my website. The idea is that you would click the button, and it would prepopulate the message field on twitter with a link. Ideally, you would authenticate through twitter.com so I can avoid handling passwords. I understand you can use a link like: http: