[twitter-dev] Re: Friendship.create is confusing

2009-03-17 Thread Doug Williams
Gary, Alex wrote this a while back and it suddenly seems relevant [1]. [1] - http://apiwiki.twitter.com/Migrating-to-followers-terminology Doug Williams Twitter API Support http://twitter.com/dougw On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Gary Zhao garyz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all I'm sort of

[twitter-dev] Re: Friendship.create is confusing

2009-03-17 Thread TjL
Follower is clear (someone you follow) Friend is (kinda) clear if you know what Follower means (If a Follower is someone who follows you, then a Friend must be someone you follow.) I understand the desire to move away from the term Friend as Someone You Follow (as it can be confusing) but

[twitter-dev] Re: Friendship.create is confusing

2009-03-17 Thread Gary Zhao
Things still confusing. As per the article, The New Terminology Things are now decidedly simpler: you follow other users, and other users follow you. You can turn notifications on and off on a per-user basis. So looks like Friendship.create is to follow someone and Notification.follow is to turn

[twitter-dev] Re: Friendship.create is confusing

2009-03-17 Thread Chris Thomson
To simply follow a person, use friendships create. Notifications are for toggling notifications (updates from a particular user) on/off to the authenticated user's SMS device. Chris Thomson http://twitter.com/chris24 On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Gary Zhao garyz...@gmail.com wrote: Things

[twitter-dev] Re: Friendship.create is confusing

2009-03-17 Thread Gary Zhao
Why not categorize them in three roles?I would rather consider a friend is whom you are following and he/she follows you as well. For example, if someone I follow but he doesn't follow me, I can't send direct messages to him. How can I consider him as a friend? A friend should be someone you can