I would love to see twitter include the original unwrapped url in a
key/value in the annotation field (else otherwise it's own specific
key/value in the payload).

There are loads of use cases for this: from search/discovery through
to reducing latency for twitter clients that want to show the original
url to the user (now potentially a two-stage task if url is <original>
-> bit.ly -> t.co)

B


On Jun 9, 12:13 pm, Jim Gilliam <j...@gilliam.com> wrote:
> I'm creating a new thread for this because a few others have mentioned it,
> and we haven't gotten a response yet.  My hunch is that changing those APIs
> involve other teams within Twitter, so figuring out a solution could be
> challenging.
>
> Here is the issue.  We need to be able to get matches on the original URL
> through the streaming and search APIs.   For me, I'm tracking "act" so I can
> match tweets that link to 'http://act.ly'.  This is not a link shortener
> service, the actual pages live at act.ly, and it was all designed
> specifically for Twitter so there would be no need for url shorteners.
>
> As far as I'm concerned, it's fine if that link changes to t.co, as long as
> I can still get matches on act.ly (or act) through the streaming API (the
> search API is going to be important for people too, but less of an issue for
> me personally).
>
> The most elegant way to fix this would be to allow tracking of the original
> URL.  So I can put in a domain name, or URL substring, and match everything
> that way.  Same with search. This would be useful to a lot of people, and
> virtually all link oriented web apps with APIs provide a way to get all the
> matches for a particular domain. (digg, google, yahoo, etc)
>
> I'm sure there are other workaround ways of doing this, and I'm all ears.
>  It would be SUPER NICE (wink wink) to hear some kind of assurance that
> there will be a way for us to query this type of information before
> the t.cochanges go live.
>
> Thanks guys...
>
> Jim Gilliamhttp://act.ly/http://twitter.com/jgilliam
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Jim Gilliam <j...@gilliam.com> wrote:
> > Will we be able to get matches on the original URL through the streaming
> > API?
>
> > For example, I'm tracking "act" so I can match tweets that link to '
> >http://act.ly'.  Will I still be able to do that?
>
> > Jim Gilliam
> >http://act.ly/
> >http://twitter.com/jgilliam
>
> > On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Dewald Pretorius <dpr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> Raffi,
>
> >> I'm fine with everything up to the new 140 character count.
>
> >> If you count the characters *after* link wrapping, you are seriously
> >> going to mess up my system. My short URLs are currently 18 characters
> >> long, and they will be 18 long for quite some time to come. After that
> >> they will be 19 for a very long time to come.
>
> >> If you implement this change, a ton, and I mean a *huge* number of my
> >> system's updates are going to be rejected for being over 140
> >> characters.
>
> >> On Jun 8, 7:57 pm, Raffi Krikorian <ra...@twitter.com> wrote:
> >> > hi all.
>
> >> > twitter has been wrapping links in e-mailed DMs for a couple months
> >> > now<http://bit.ly/twttldmemail>.
> >> > with that feature, we're trying to protect users against phishing and
> >> other
> >> > malicious attacks. the way that we're doing this is that any URL that
> >> comes
> >> > through in a DM gets currently wrapped with a twt.tl URL -- if the URL
> >> turns
> >> > out to be malicious, Twitter can simply shut it down, and whoever
> >> follows
> >> > that link will be presented with a page that warns them of potentially
> >> > malicious content. in a few weeks, we're going to start slowly enabling
> >> this
> >> > throughout the API for all statuses as well, but instead of twt.tl, we
> >> will
> >> > be using t.co.
>
> >> > practically, any tweet that is sent through statuses/update that has a
> >> link
> >> > on it will have the link automatically converted to a t.co link on its
> >> way
> >> > through the Twitter platform. if you fetch any tweet created after this
> >> > change goes live, then its text field will have all its links
> >> automatically
> >> > wrapped with t.co links. when a user clicks on that link, Twitter will
> >> > redirect them to the original URL after first confirming with our
> >> database
> >> > that that URL is not malicious.  on top of the end-user benefit, we hope
> >> to
> >> > eventually provide all developers with aggregate usage data around your
> >> > applications such as the number of clicks people make on URLs you
> >> display
> >> > (it will, of course, be in aggregate and not identifiable manner).
> >> > additionally, we want to be able to build services and APIs that can
> >> make
> >> > algorithmic recommendations to users based on the content they are
> >> > consuming. gathering the data from t.co will help make these possible.
>
> >> > our current plan is that no user will see a t.co URL on twitter.com but
> >> we
> >> > still have some details to work through. the links will still be
> >> displayed
> >> > as they were sent in, but the target of the link will be the t.co link
> >> > instead. and, we want to provide the same ability to display original
> >> links
> >> > to developers. we're going to use the entities attribute to make this
> >> > possible.
>
> >> > let's say i send out the following tweet: "you have to check outhttp://
> >> dev.twitter.com!"
>
> >> > a returned (and truncated) status object may look like:
>
> >> > {
> >> >   "text" : "you have to check outhttp://t.co/s9gfk2d4!";,
> >> >   ...
> >> >   "user" : {
> >> >     "screen_name" : "raffi",
> >> >     ...
> >> >   },
> >> >   ...
> >> >   "entities" : {
> >> >     "urls" : [
> >> >       {
> >> >         "url" : "http://t.co/s9gfk2d4";,
> >> >         "display_url" : "http://dev.twitter.com";,
> >> >         "indices" : [23, 43]
> >> >       }
> >> >     ],
> >> >     ...
> >> >   },
> >> >   ...
>
> >> > }
>
> >> > two things to note: the text of the returned status object doesn't have
> >> the
> >> > original URL and instead it has a t.co URL, and the entities block now
> >> has a
> >> > display_url attribute associated with it. what we're hoping is that with
> >> > this data, it should be relatively easy to create a UI where you replace
> >> thehttp://t.co/s9gfk2d4inthe text with the equivalent of
>
> >> > <a href="http://t.co/s9gfk2d4";>http://dev.twitter.com</a>
>
> >> > this means the user would not see the t.co link, but we all can still
> >> > provide the protection and gather data from the wrapped link. for the
> >> > applications that don't choose to update, the t.co link will be shown
> >> (and
> >> > the goal to protect users will be met). i just want to emphasize -- we
> >> > really do hope that you all render the original URL, but please send the
> >> > user through the t.co link.   if you do choose to prefetch all the URLs
> >> on a
> >> > timeline, then, when a user actually clicks on one of the links, please
> >> > still send him or her through t.co. We will be updating the TOS to
> >> require
> >> > you to check t.co and register the click.
>
> >> > related to this: the way the Twitter API counts characters is going to
> >> > change ever so slightly. our 140 characters is now going to be defined
> >> as
> >> > 140 characters after link wrapping. t.co links are of a predictable
> >> length
> >> > -- they will always be 20 characters. after we make this live, it will
> >> be
> >> > feasible to send in the text for a status that is greater than 140
> >> > characters. the rule is after the link wrapping, the text transforms to
> >> 140
> >> > characters or fewer. we'll be using the same logic that is in
> >> > twitter-text-rb to figure out what is a URL.
>
> >> > look for an update to dev.twitter.com where we'll have a best practices
> >> > document on how to use these t.co links.
>
> >> > what's the timeline?  "soon" we'll enable this on @twitterapi, @rsarver,
> >> > @raffi, and a few other test accounts so you all have live data to play
> >> > with.  on the timescale of weeks (to potentially a month or two), we'll
> >> roll
> >> > this out to everybody.
>
> >> > of course, if there are any questions, just feel free to direct them to
> >> > @twitterapi!
>
> >> > --
> >> > Raffi Krikorian
> >> > Twitter Platform Teamhttp://twitter.com/raffi

Reply via email to