I'm working on Favorites and a user of ours has status id #773146783
which for some reason is showing reply_to_status_id of 0. This is
mucking with my parsing code and I'd rather not add a special-case.
Any one else seeing similar issues, have suggestions?
I am looking for an experienced Twitter API Developer for a project.
Without disclosing the details, it would require the following:
- List of latest X number of tweets from a list of twitter users (IE I
will specify dozens, or even hundreds of twitter users who I want to
follow, on my site it
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Andrew Badera and...@badera.us wrote:
And there's no reason in the world to expose this list to people who
aren't making API calls -- period!
This line suggests that you should be currently developing an app (thus
making API calls) to access this list, which
The lag wasn't nearly as noticeable when the update_profile_image was first
offered, but has since as you noted become considerable.
As a work around my app, which updates profile images from a local source,
uses the local source to represent the new avatar after I receive the HTTP
status codes
Hi Basha,
The max_id is only intended to be used for pagination via the
next_url and prev_url fields and is known not to work with since_id.
It is not documented as a valid parameter because it's known to only
work in the case it was designed for. We added the max_id to prevent
the
That value looks like bogus data. That tweet is from @biz, a Twitter
co-founder. You can do anything you want when you are co-founder -- like
setting in_reply_to_status_id's equal to 0.
Doug Williams
Twitter API Support
http://twitter.com/dougw
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Joshua Perry
Seriously! Take his MySQL access away.
Doug Williams wrote:
That value looks like bogus data. That tweet is from @biz, a Twitter
co-founder. You can do anything you want when you are co-founder --
like setting in_reply_to_status_id's equal to 0.
Doug Williams
Twitter API Support
couldn't this actually happen a lot though, if you wrote an app and were
passing in this value and the value got dropped? or does the system ignore
this?
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Joshua Perry j...@6bit.com wrote:
Seriously! Take his MySQL access away.
Doug Williams wrote:
That
Peter,
As was described here [1], invalid in_reply_to_status_id's are no longer
accepted. We now verify the status_id is valid and that the author is being
mentioned. Otherwise the parameter is ignored.
1.
Solution: Create a status with id = 0.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:51, Doug Williams d...@twitter.com wrote:
Peter,
As was described here [1], invalid in_reply_to_status_id's are no longer
accepted. We now verify the status_id is valid and that the author is being
mentioned. Otherwise the
I am developing a Twitter based app running on Google's App Engine -
http://twittemmender.appspot.com (it is up but not working properly
right now)
The main idea is to recommend you tweeps that are close to you based
on your latest tweets (and some machine learning on your tweets). For
this I
Thanks Alex for making sure this gets taken care of. It's been driving
me nuts here chasing ghosts why my IO appears to be blocked when its
actually trying to just pull a massive image.
Basically I'm having all the same issue other are having... My IO
library doesn't make it easy to cancel a
I'm testing out a pretty simple OAuth app - the user verifies, and I
then push an update to their status.
The confounding part is I am getting absolutely random values in the
'From' field. It was originally Coolspotters, now TVtweets, and I can
only be curious as to what it chooses next.
The
OAuth apps automatically get their source info added. The app ids must be
getting jumbled somewhere. A work around might be to manually set source=web
or whatever source you want.
Try creating an bug report: http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/list
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 15:46, AhmedF
As it is - I am using your code as the base for the OAuth transaction
- and all attempts to set source/from have failed.
I'm waiting on getting approved as a legit 'from' field and then
seeing what happens.
On Apr 1, 5:10 pm, Abraham Williams 4bra...@gmail.com wrote:
OAuth apps automatically
Hi All,
Is it possible to search a finer time interval that a day? For example
search between 12:00 and 1:00 on a specific day. I have tried numerous
formats to extend the since and until operators to include
hour:minute:second with no luck.
Many thanks,
Cestino
And a little follow up - so I updated that status 30 minutes ago,
where it claimed the from was 'TVTweets'. Just tried again, and now
both of the messages are from 'Testery'
I guess something is definitely buggy.
On Apr 1, 5:17 pm, AhmedF inde...@gmail.com wrote:
As it is - I am using your
It definitely sounds like a bug. Open an issue and we'll take a look.
Thanks;
— Matt Sanford
On Apr 1, 2009, at 02:21 PM, AhmedF wrote:
And a little follow up - so I updated that status 30 minutes ago,
where it claimed the from was 'TVTweets'. Just tried again, and now
both of the messages
Try using source=twhirl and see if it shows up as Twhirl and sticks.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 16:21, AhmedF inde...@gmail.com wrote:
And a little follow up - so I updated that status 30 minutes ago,
where it claimed the from was 'TVTweets'. Just tried again, and now
both of the messages are
Ahmed,
Are you currently passing in anything with your requests as a source
parameter?
Doug Williams
Twitter API Support
http://twitter.com/dougw
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 2:21 PM, AhmedF inde...@gmail.com wrote:
And a little follow up - so I updated that status 30 minutes ago,
where it
Cestino,
Search only allows dates to be specified down to the day. We don't allow the
granularity to be more specific than that. If you are only looking for a
specific hour, our current recommendation is to do client-side filtering.
Thanks,
Doug Williams
Twitter API Support
Newp - ignored it. I tried it with source='Twhirl' and source='twhirl'
I even just passed only a status value (that part has always worked).
Bouncing between random 'from' sources for all of my OAuth posts.
I'll admit I'm new to OAuth, and I am using Abraham's PHP example
code, but I've been
Matt will look into your report [1]. Thanks for the report, Ahmed.
1. http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/detail?id=408
Doug Williams
Twitter API Support
http://twitter.com/dougw
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 2:29 PM, AhmedF inde...@gmail.com wrote:
I've left it empty and tried 'source' or
In my experience. If you are posting from an OAuth enabled app, the
From value (should) be the value you put into the OAuth app name
form when creating the app. All source parameters passed will be
ignored. I would imagine this is a pretty good security measure to
help track down malapps (yes,
Perhaps it may be possible to have some kind of community agreement on
a don't Tweet meta-character. Obviously this would be usless for
bots that didn't follow the request but would be a start.
On Mar 29, 11:23 pm, Chad Etzel jazzyc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Wondering what everyone's
I am working on writing and OAuth client in Java for Twitter and I am
hitting the wall when trying to get the Access Token. I am able to
successfully get a sign and get a token, forward to the authorize
page, get a response, but after that, when trying to get the Access
Token, it dies. The
I guess just for future reference - Matt looked into it, identified it
as a bug, and said it should be fixed soon.
Thanks.
On Apr 1, 5:40 pm, Chad Etzel jazzyc...@gmail.com wrote:
In my experience. If you are posting from an OAuth enabled app, the
From value (should) be the value you put
Ahmed,
This is a confirmed bug. The good news is Matt and Alex tag-teamed it and
have the fix readied for deploy.
Cheers,
Doug Williams
Twitter API Support
http://twitter.com/dougw
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 3:23 PM, AhmedF inde...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess just for future reference - Matt looked
On 4/1/09 5:51 PM, rhysmeister wrote:
Perhaps it may be possible to have some kind of community agreement on
a don't Tweet meta-character. Obviously this would be usless for
bots that didn't follow the request but would be a start.
Maybe it wasn't a popular meme, but does anyone remember this
(Not an April Fool, we promise. We don't enjoy humor.)
* Feature (REST API): We now return the same representation of User
objects throughout the API. This representation contains all of the
attributes we make available via the API.
A bit more about this change:
Previously, these full User
Does this include the Social Graph API methods?
Jesse
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Alex Payne a...@twitter.com wrote:
(Not an April Fool, we promise. We don't enjoy humor.)
* Feature (REST API): We now return the same representation of User
objects throughout the API. This
Fantastic news.
Are the direct message's recipient and sender objects updated as well?
Zac Bowling
http://twitter.com/zbowling
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Alex Payne a...@twitter.com wrote:
(Not an April Fool, we promise. We don't enjoy humor.)
* Feature (REST API): We now return the
No, only methods that previously returned User objects.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 17:54, Jesse Stay jesses...@gmail.com wrote:
Does this include the Social Graph API methods?
Jesse
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Alex Payne a...@twitter.com wrote:
(Not an April Fool, we promise. We don't
Egads! No, they aren't, but that's a quick fix. Will have it out
tomorrow, hopefully, Monday at the latest.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 17:57, Zac Bowling zbowl...@gmail.com wrote:
Fantastic news.
Are the direct message's recipient and sender objects updated as well?
Zac Bowling
I'm not sure if it's related to this push, but I've started to get
several user objects back with no statuses_updates.
This is a somewhat blocking bug for TweetStats as I try to verify they
have tweets while verifying the account. Though I can just try to
enumerate through and will probably have
Hi guy,
I have just integrated OAuth into my web app, and all is going well
except for one thing:
When I call friendships/exists I always receive Invalid OAuth
Request.
It seems that if my request to friendships/exists works if it is a
POST, but if it is a GET it never works.
Can I rely that
Sorry, I meant statuses_count.
On Apr 1, 7:23 pm, Damon P. Cortesi d.lifehac...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure if it's related to this push, but I've started to get
several user objects back with no statuses_updates.
This is a somewhat blocking bug for TweetStats as I try to verify they
have
http://apiwiki.twitter.com/Libraries and
http://apiwiki.twitter.com/Open-source
Thanks
--
Gary
http://twitter.com/garyzhao
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Damon P. Cortesi d.lifehac...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure if it's related to this push, but I've started to get
several user objects back with no statuses_updates.
Sorry, I meant statuses_count.
nor favourites_count, nor friends_count...
here's my
And is this available now via the JSON API interface because,
according to my tests, I do not see any in the middle of a tweet
mentions being reported by the API.
Thanks - Martin
On Mar 31, 1:33 pm, Joshua Perry j...@6bit.com wrote:
This hasn't been said but I'm assuming this is only for tweets
As of right right now: http://twitter.com/users/show/bob.xml
has about twice the amount of information as say:
http://twitter.com/users/show/WeezerOfficial.xml
On Apr 2, 3:34 am, Alex Payne a...@twitter.com wrote:
(Not an April Fool, we promise. We don't enjoy humor.)
* Feature (REST API):
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Adrian spiritpo...@gmail.com wrote:
As of right right now: http://twitter.com/users/show/bob.xml
has about twice the amount of information as say:
http://twitter.com/users/show/WeezerOfficial.xml
FTA:
Please note that this new extended view of User objects
From what method calls?
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 19:23, Damon P. Cortesi d.lifehac...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure if it's related to this push, but I've started to get
several user objects back with no statuses_updates.
This is a somewhat blocking bug for TweetStats as I try to verify they
I think you might be missing oauth_token from your access_token URL
parameter string in the snippet above, it should travel with the other
parameters and it its secret is hashed with the consumer secret in the
signature base.
It can be painful to solve whatever small deviation is causing your
44 matches
Mail list logo
