[twitter-dev] Re: OAuth and "native" clients

2009-07-13 Thread Otávio Ribeiro
agreed, regards, Otávio Ribeiro On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Zach wrote: > > I'm going to 3rd Sebastian's POV. This is a serious problem that > needs to be addressed now. Mobile app developers want to integrate > their native apps with sites like Twitter and Faceb

[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH: Basic Auth is simpler/more reliable/more secure/better received than OAuth!?

2009-07-28 Thread Otávio Ribeiro
. regards, Otávio Ribeiro On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 8:27 AM, chinaski007 wrote: > > > Let's be honest... > > The end-result for third-party developers using OAuth appears to be > fewer sign-ups, less reliability, more complexity, and potentially > less security. > &g

[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH: Basic Auth is simpler/more reliable/more secure/better received than OAuth!?

2009-07-31 Thread Otávio Ribeiro
breach of all systems is the user. And unfortunately we can not change them as fast as we can change our codes. :-( That is just my opinion and i´m a little "out of date" within oauth. I like the idea but think that the current flow is very poor for mobile and embedded devices. regards,

[twitter-dev] Re: OAuth + Mobile nightmare

2009-08-18 Thread Otávio Ribeiro
no.. just the same problem. On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:09 PM, AArruda wrote: > > I've been developing a Java/MIDP Twitter client for the past two > months, and i still need a couple more months to publish a beta > version. A few days ago i found out that the update source (app name) > is no longer