They're separate ID spaces.
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Harshad RJ wrote:
> Good observation and reasonable assumption.
>
> However, there is a thin possibility that these are being assigned from
> different sub-spaces within the same address space.
>
> I am still hoping it is the case sin
Good observation and reasonable assumption.
However, there is a thin possibility that these are being assigned from
different sub-spaces within the same address space.
I am still hoping it is the case since it will simplify my DB design much.
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Michael Steuer wro
I don't know for sure but as tweet id's are sequential and the current
dm id counter is way lower than the current tweet id, I would assume
they're separate sets...
On Dec 13, 2009, at 10:25 PM, Harshad RJ wrote:
Hi,
Are the DM ids unique within {DMs + Tweets} set or only in the {DM}
Hi,
Are the DM ids unique within {DMs + Tweets} set or only in the {DM} set?
In other words, if I am storing a collection of DMs and Tweets in a DB, can
I index it safely using DM.id and Tweet.id ?
thanks,
--
Harshad RJ
http://hrj.wikidot.com
