Let's be honest...

The end-result for third-party developers using OAuth appears to be
fewer sign-ups, less reliability, more complexity, and potentially
less security.

Google Optimizer reveals that users are more likely to sign-up for
Basic Auth than OAuth.  That's just fact.  Test it for yourself to
confirm.

I suppose this is not so weird.  Users are accustomed to giving user/
pass information even to "foreign" apps.  It is far more disruptive
and invasive for them to go to some bizarre Twitter screen asking them
to "approve an app".  To the average user, what does that mean?  (And,
heck, it may even require more steps if they have to login again to
Twitter.)

In terms of reliability, Twitter OAuth was down for days several weeks
ago.  Tonight yet another unannounced change occurred that broke major
code libraries.  Meanwhile, Basic Auth has been plugging along just
fine and dandy...

So what IS the benefit of OAuth?

It doesn't benefit developers as you will likely get more sign-ups
with Basic Auth and Basic Auth is far, far easier to setup.  Sure,
OAuth might satisfy some power users hungry for security...

But is OAuth even more secure than Basic Auth?

Perhaps not.  After all, tonight's fix was for an OAuth security flaw
known for at least 10+ days (judging by tweets to @twitterapi) that
allowed for potential impersonations of credentialed users.

On the heels of Twitter's (unofficial) assurance of better
communication with developers, this sort of unannounced change is
distressing.  What's next?  (Have Labor Day Weekend plans?  You might
want to cancel those... just the right time for Twitter to make an
unannounced API change!)

As for us, we are in the strange position of deprecating OAuth in
favor of Basic Auth.

Weird, eh??

Okay, we are not totally deprecating OAuth, but we are advising users
that Basic Auth is far more robust and reliable.

And so our message to new developers: avoid OAuth like the plague.  If
you must, offer it.  But let Basic Auth be your backbone: more
reliable, more sign-ups, simpler, and probably just as secure.  (Just
look at Google Code bug reports about OAuth to get a sense of
reliablity.)

(Okay, okay, this post was written at 4am after a workday that started
at 8am, and after Twitter introduced this new change at 5pm... (hey
Twitter, can you introduce major new changes EARLIER in the day so we
can react!?!?)... it still doesn't excuse Twitter's continued
disregard for the small-to-medium size developer.)

Reply via email to