That's great news. Thank you, Ryan.
How about terms like "tweet" and "retweet"? Or more generally, any word on
the questions raised in the "Question about licensing" thread?
http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk/browse_thread/thread/9f90046f6469fb7b/954f6dc75e00e992
In parti
Duane,
I've been able to follow up with our lawyers and they confirmed that it is
ok to include "Twitter" in the name of libraries that developers build.
Sorry it took so long to follow up, but I wanted to make sure we got a
strong, final answer back before responding.
Best, Ryan
On Fri, Dec 4,
Just wanted to follow up with everyone and let you know we are still on this
and haven't forgotten about the thread. Hopefully will have an answer for
you soon.
Best, Ryan
2009/12/5 Ryan Sarver
> Duane,
>
> We definitely don't want to be sending any "nastygrams", especially for
> something that
Duane,
We definitely don't want to be sending any "nastygrams", especially for
something that helps the community. I put a note into our legal / marks
department so that I can get an answer back to you and everyone else. Please
bear with us as it could take a bit, but I'll get you an answer.
Best
On 12/4/2009 2:39 PM, Duane Roelands wrote:
A question for the Twitter team:
I'm the developer and maintainer of an open source library called
"TwitterVB". Can I expect a nastygram from your lawyers at some
point? Or is there some way I can have the project "vetted" to avoid
such a thing in th
A question for the Twitter team:
I'm the developer and maintainer of an open source library called
"TwitterVB". Can I expect a nastygram from your lawyers at some
point? Or is there some way I can have the project "vetted" to avoid
such a thing in the future?
