My bad, I actually made a code that caused our logging to print out
the unix time when I would start polling again instead of the seconds
to back off for like it previously had.
Mea Culpa!
Ben
On Oct 29, 2:23 pm, Chad Etzel wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> It sounds like that value is a unix timestamp, which is a bug. The
> retry-value should be a "seconds from now" value... The search team is
> investigating. Thanks for reporting.
> -Chad
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Benjamin Darfler wrote:
>
> > We are using the search api and respecting the 503 and retry-after
> > values however I've seen a retry value in the 40 YEARS range a few
> > times in the past week. Whats up with that?
>
> > Ben
