No one accused you to be a spammer, and there are definitely very useful
scenarios for such a functionality. But, and that's the key point, there a
many many more scenarios in which it could be abused by spammers...
Marco
2009/10/20 HAR Devel
>
> I can see how this might look like a spammer's re
I can see how this might look like a spammer's request, but it can be
used for legitimate purposes. Thanks for the info though.
On Oct 15, 9:06 am, Andrew Badera wrote:
> Haven't you heard about the allegedly spammer-hostile Address Book API
> that's coming soon?
>
> ∞ Andy Badera
> ∞ +1 518-641
Haven't you heard about the allegedly spammer-hostile Address Book API
that's coming soon?
∞ Andy Badera
∞ +1 518-641-1280
∞ This email is: [ ] bloggable [x] ask first [ ] private
∞ Google me: http://www.google.com/search?q=andrew%20badera
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Duane Roelands
wrot
...and there never ever should be.
On Oct 14, 4:55 pm, JDG wrote:
> no.
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 09:50, HAR HAR wrote:
>
> > There was a post on this group called "API Method for checking if a
> > user exists?" a while ago. The method for checking if a user exist
> > described there no longe
no.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 09:50, HAR HAR wrote:
>
> There was a post on this group called "API Method for checking if a
> user exists?" a while ago. The method for checking if a user exist
> described there no longer works. Is there a way for me to use the API
> to verify if an email address i
