A small group of us (mainly Harvard students, but others as well) had
similar questions a few months back and we've started digging into the
research pretty heavily (also doing contracting/consulting). Our group
is called the Web Ecology Project and we've released a handful of
academic (but
Careful! Stefna was talking about semantic meaning. Not
syntactic ...
But I think you're right - Stefna, please us tell a bit more about the
context.
And - what do you think of when you say strict formed data?
What exactly do you want to achieve?
Maybe your promoter should tell you in more
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Stefna mstefa...@gmail.com wrote:
strict formed data - 140 chars, #tag, @username, RT etc. - that's
why there are so many sites presenting graphs, charts, trends,
tendencies etc.
I suspect a large part of the answer to that is simply Because they can.
Unlike
http://www.searchenginejournal.com/twitter-hashtags/9419/
On Sep 25, 1:46 pm, Kevin Mesiab ke...@mesiablabs.com wrote:
Good luck and I look forward to reading some drafts, yeah?
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 7:41 AM, Stefna mstefa...@gmail.com wrote:
I've submitted a ticket with following
Good luck buddy.. Btw I'm curious, What exactly are you referring to
or focussing on when you say 'syntactic meaning of tweets' ?
I mean I'd appreciate a clarification on 'syntactic meaning to whom ?'
and 'syntactic meaning of tweets in what context ?'
Just wondering..
Best Regards,
Nalin
On
Good luck and I look forward to reading some drafts, yeah?
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 7:41 AM, Stefna mstefa...@gmail.com wrote:
I've submitted a ticket with following content:
*** *** ***
I am a 23 years old student of informatics at AGH Universtity of
Science and Technology in Cracow
