RE: [twitter-dev] Problem with the API Console

2010-05-26 Thread Brian Smith
Daniel wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> For example, I try to retrive the last tweets of a particular user I
choose "GET"
> "statuses/user_timeline" with "json" protocol and in the parameters and
values
> fields I set "id" and "radiohead" as the user screen name.
> 
> The result I get is my own timeline. That is the default result when you
set no
> parameters at all and the parameters don't show up in the generated
request
> either.

It seems that the console ignores the parameters, at least if the method is
GET.

I recommend using twurl instead. Twurl was easier to install than I expected
and it seems to work great, even on Windows.

Regards,
Brian



Re: [twitter-dev] Problem with the API Console

2010-05-26 Thread Taylor Singletary
Hi Daniel,

There are still some bugs here and there with the API console that we
haven't had a chance to clean up yet.

Another alternative you can use to explore the API from a web-based
console is the great API console Apigee provides at
http://app.apigee.com/console

Taylor Singletary
Developer Advocate, Twitter
http://twitter.com/episod



On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 4:47 AM, Daniel  wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm new to the twitter API and found the API Conlose (http://
> dev.twitter.com/console) very handy to try requests and understand
> what you can do with it, but I'm kind of stuck with the impossibility
> to set up parameters :
>
> For example, I try to retrive the last tweets of a particular user I
> choose "GET" "statuses/user_timeline" with "json" protocol and in the
> parameters and values fields I set "id" and "radiohead" as the user
> screen name.
>
> The result I get is my own timeline. That is the default result when
> you set no parameters at all and the parameters don't show up in the
> generated request either.
>
> Am I missing something ?
>
> A basic search on Google and this website, and the reading of the FAQ
> didn't show up anything interesting. Does anyone else experience this
> problem ?
>
> Thanks.
>