precisely. no offense intended. i was just amused. (and, if you
knew me better, you would realise that i thought a oauth enabled text
only client is quite rad).
>> > i wouldn't qualify a text-only client as a desktop client :P
>>
>> Funny, the 800 people who are using my OAuth-enabled text-only client
>> seem to think it works just fine. Just because -you- don't like it
>> doesn't mean it doesn't count.
>
> I don't think that's what Raffi meant. I understood it to mean that a
> text-only client isn't a typical desktop environment, which I agree with
> (hence my interest in the browserless API).
>
> --
> personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/
> --
> Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckai...@floodgap.com
> -- To describe bitter medicine will not improve its flavor. -- Charlie Chan
> ---
>
--
Raffi Krikorian
Twitter Platform Team
http://twitter.com/raffi