Re: [twitter-dev] Re: Best way to test success/failure for a status update

2010-01-21 Thread Raffi Krikorian
to be very precise, all that we guarantee is that the id is monotonically
increasing -- we don't have any guarantees on the rate at which the ids are
increasing

On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Abraham Williams <4bra...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> 2010/1/16 M. Edward (Ed) Borasky 
>
> Is
>> this in fact a valid assumption, and is it documented anywhere? I'm
>> anal about that sort of thing for a variety of reasons. ;-)
>>
>
> Yes. I'm not sure if it is documented anywhere other then emails from
> Twitter to the group.
>
> Abraham
>
> --
> Abraham Williams | Moved to Seattle | May cause email delays
> Project | Intersect | http://intersect.labs.poseurtech.com
> Hacker | http://abrah.am | http://twitter.com/abraham
> This email is: [ ] shareable [x] ask first [ ] private.
> Sent from Seattle, WA, United States
>



-- 
Raffi Krikorian
Twitter Platform Team
http://twitter.com/raffi


Re: [twitter-dev] Re: Best way to test success/failure for a status update

2010-01-20 Thread Abraham Williams
2010/1/16 M. Edward (Ed) Borasky 

> Is
> this in fact a valid assumption, and is it documented anywhere? I'm
> anal about that sort of thing for a variety of reasons. ;-)
>

Yes. I'm not sure if it is documented anywhere other then emails from
Twitter to the group.

Abraham

-- 
Abraham Williams | Moved to Seattle | May cause email delays
Project | Intersect | http://intersect.labs.poseurtech.com
Hacker | http://abrah.am | http://twitter.com/abraham
This email is: [ ] shareable [x] ask first [ ] private.
Sent from Seattle, WA, United States