Some of the features you are looking for are part of the @Anywhere arm of the platform: http://dev.twitter.com/anywhere
Taylor On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 8:29 AM, D. Smith <emai...@sharedlog.com> wrote: > What, nobody else thinkgs it could be useful to have some sort or JS > based UI for the Tweet button? The Facebook JS UI is pretty good, you > can open the prompt and pre-fill it with a text message to be posted > to the wall right from your own javascript, user then just has to > click on "Post" button. > Also in Facebook UI you can have a simple one line of JS to test if > user is logged in to Facebook. > It would be great if Twitter made a simple UI for opening the "Tweet" > window programmatically, and also allowing to listen to onSuccess > (tweet posted, window closed) or onFailure events. It would also be > great to programmatically test if user is currently logged in to > Twitter (or at least has Twitter account). > > Please lets get this topic going, I think it's important. > > > > On Aug 15, 12:24 pm, Dmitri Snytkine <d.snytk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello! > > I have a small request about the official Tweet button. > > It would be great if there was some way to know when user has > > successfully sent a tweet via a tweet popup window and after the > > window is closed. > > > > I am sure Twitter dev team can implement this easily. The benefit to a > > site owner is that if I know that a user has just Tweeted about my > > page, I therefore know that a user has a Twitter account, then I can > > show some prompt to ask a user to join my site with their Twitter > > account, I can also show a custom message like "Thank you for sharing > > this page on Twtitter" as well as can do many other things, even > > recording some data to my database to keep track which of my > > registered users has shared pages. > > > > All I need is some sort of a callback function to be fired on closing > > of that window. > > This could be some sort of custom event that I can subscribe to or > > some sort of callback function. > > > > Does this make sense? >