Makes sense. On the web interface you only ever see update1 to manually
retweet.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 04:16, Tim Haines wrote:
> I'll give you an unofficial yes. This is exactly the way I understand it
> will work. If you star any of the RT's it's update1 that gets the stars
> too.
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Hwee-Boon Yar wrote:
>
>> I did an experiment.
>>
>> user1 tweets update1
>> user2 retweets update1 as update2 (a RT, with update1 embedded)
>> user3 retweets update2, the embedded update is update1 instead of
>> update2.
>>
>> I can't find documentation on this. Is this the expected behavoir?
>>
>> --
>> Hwee-Boon
>>
>
>
--
Abraham Williams | Community Evangelist | http://web608.org
Hacker | http://abrah.am | http://twitter.com/abraham
Project | Awesome Lists | http://twitterli.st
This email is: [ ] blogable [x] ask first [ ] private.
Sent from Madison, WI, United States
