Fastream Technologies wrote:
I suspect it could be a critical section issue since we use
multi-threads and multi-clients/thread.
Please be more specific, what critical section are you talking
about? The critical sections in OverbyteIcsWndControl.pas are
required.
I wonder if there is limit
Hello Arno,
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Arno Garrels arno.garr...@gmx.de wrote:
Fastream Technologies wrote:
I suspect it could be a critical section issue since we use
multi-threads and multi-clients/thread.
Please be more specific, what critical section are you talking
about? The
Fastream Technologies wrote:
So
it's getting better but it uses less than 20% CPU overall (only 1 of
4 cores is utilized) and our ICS-based process uses only 10% in task
manager! What may be preventing it to use 100%?
Looks like your instances are running all in the same thread
context,
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Arno Garrels arno.garr...@gmx.de wrote:
Fastream Technologies wrote:
So
it's getting better but it uses less than 20% CPU overall (only 1 of
4 cores is utilized) and our ICS-based process uses only 10% in task
manager! What may be preventing it to use
Fastream Technologies wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Arno Garrels arno.garr...@gmx.de
wrote:
Fastream Technologies wrote:
So
it's getting better but it uses less than 20% CPU overall (only 1 of
4 cores is utilized) and our ICS-based process uses only 10% in task
manager! What
of multiple THttpCli instances
Fastream Technologies wrote:
So
it's getting better but it uses less than 20% CPU overall (only 1 of
4 cores is utilized) and our ICS-based process uses only 10% in task
manager! What may be preventing it to use 100%?
Looks like your instances are running all
With reconfiguring (turning off HTML translation) via our program GUI, I
have been able to get 3X speed up to 1500 keep-alive requests/sec (when
cache is off and this is a web proxy server). So it's getting better but
it
uses less than 20% CPU overall (only 1 of 4 cores is utilized) and our
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Francois PIETTE
francois.pie...@skynet.bewrote:
With reconfiguring (turning off HTML translation) via our program GUI, I
have been able to get 3X speed up to 1500 keep-alive requests/sec (when
cache is off and this is a web proxy server). So it's
Sorry for this post, I was replying the wrong mail.
albert
- Original Message -
From: A Drent albert.dr...@rug.nl
To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 11:19 AM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Concurrency of multiple THttpCli instances
Ok.
T.a.v. het
instances
Sorry for this post, I was replying the wrong mail.
albert
- Original Message -
From: A Drent albert.dr...@rug.nl
To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 11:19 AM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Concurrency of multiple THttpCli instances
Ok.
T.a.v
Hello,
I wonder if there is limit imposed by the design. The issue I saw during our
tests is when the cache is disabled (when one THttpCli's instance is used by
the proxy server connection socket), and when the file size is small
(1-10KB), the proxy server cannot use more than one CPU core! When
I suspect it could be a critical section issue since we use multi-threads
and multi-clients/thread.
SZ
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Fastream Technologies
ga...@fastream.comwrote:
Hello,
I wonder if there is limit imposed by the design. The issue I saw during
our tests is when the cache
12 matches
Mail list logo
