Re: [twsocket] Transfer with UDP

2005-08-20 Thread Francois PIETTE
WM Variables on the stack does not consume time. Only if something has to WM be initialized or so, like for example a long string. I am not sure that is consume no time. If I remember well, local vars are dynamicaly allocated and deallocated each time you go into the procedure, so it

Re: [twsocket] Transfer with UDP

2005-08-20 Thread Dod
Hello Francois, So I was wrong and it is nice because I tended to avoid local vars declarations :-) But I remember having read somewhere that using/accessing local vars was slower than global ones and this why I said that. WM Variables on the stack does not consume time. Only

Re: [twsocket] Transfer with UDP

2005-08-20 Thread Francois PIETTE
So I was wrong and it is nice because I tended to avoid local vars declarations :-) But I remember having read somewhere that using/accessing local vars was slower than global ones and this why I said that. The quality of a program is somewhat in inverse ratio to the number

Re: [twsocket] Transfer with UDP

2005-08-20 Thread Dan
- Original Message - From: Wilfried Mestdagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2005 8:39 AM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Transfer with UDP Hello Dan, Buffer : array [0..5] of char; Variables on the stack does not consume