GetHeapStatus always returns 0 for all fields! Why could this be?
Regards,
SZ
- Original Message -
From: Wilfried Mestdagh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 4:39 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Server problem (leaking memory)
You can buy devices to load-balance your application to several servers. For
example: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/contnetw/ps792/
Hm, hardware, it seems like a very expensive and straightforward approach.
We'd like to use it as the last thing. And the more, I'm not sure the device
Hello,
I don't know if it as something to do but if you use records
containing strings, always think to mystring:='' before releasing
record memory space because if you free the record, the string
allocation done inside will be kept.
regards.
--
To unsubscribe or change
Interesting. Well I am using classes with string properties and I thought
the destructor of the AnsiString class cleans up the memory before releasing
it.
Thank you for your time,
SZ
- Original Message -
From: Dod [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org
Sent:
Hello Fastream,
I recall it returns 0 for all fields if not using standard memory
manager. Arnt you ?
---
Rgds, Wilfried [TeamICS]
http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html
http://www.mestdagh.biz
Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 09:22, Fastream Technologies wrote:
GetHeapStatus always returns
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Interesting. Well I am using classes with string properties and I thought
the destructor of the AnsiString class cleans up the memory before
releasing it.
Correct, in classes you don't need to release memory allocated for strings.
But you need to finalize
Cisco load balancer has nothing to do with your application.
This is exactly what I've ment too. If the device counts only HTTP load, then
it is apparently useless for balancing entire application, which includes a
non-HTTP
backend with business logic. We must either make the balancer to be
Francois Piette wrote:
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Interesting. Well I am using classes with string properties and I
thought the destructor of the AnsiString class cleans up the memory
before releasing it.
Correct, in classes you don't need to release memory allocated for
strings. But you
Hello!
I saw some leaks in older Delphi versions when I didn't finalize (may be
due a mistake I made when I was a beginner?).
Seems so. Here (D3Prof) everything works properly, no leaks.
Since this time I don't really
on Delphi and free dynamic record members manually.
And you don't get
Piotr Da³ek wrote:
Hello!
I saw some leaks in older Delphi versions when I didn't finalize (may be
due a mistake I made when I was a beginner?).
Seems so. Here (D3Prof) everything works properly, no leaks.
Since this time I don't really
on Delphi and free dynamic record members
Hello!
Since this time I don't really
on Delphi and free dynamic record members manually.
And you don't get AVs and/or Invalid Pointer Operation exceptions?
No problemo.
Finalize(P^); or AString := '';
Dispose(P);
Hint: Dispose acts as Finalize+FreeMem. No need to finalize records
Hello,
In the latest version that I have in which I implemented the Arno's
TSSLMTServer method, and even in old versions, after some load, the server
component halts. I see nothing strange in the task manager: 9MB ram used up,
459 handles, etc.. Could this be related to TIME_WAIT (I HIGHLY
i dont't want receive those mail list.then are too much from my
mailbox.do you help me to stop send mail to me? my email is [EMAIL
PROTECTED]. becuase i can't find the place where i can stop it .
Like seen at the bottom of each email from the list :
To unsubscribe or change your
13 matches
Mail list logo
