[twsocket] Slightly OT: How many of you agree that 2GB memory limit of 32-bit BDS code is insufficient?

2007-02-25 Thread Fastream Technologies
Hello, Just trying to learn how other Borland coders building ICS servers are feeling about it. Best Regards, SZ -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be

Re: [twsocket] Performance on the latest ICS V6

2007-02-25 Thread Bjørnar Nielsen
I have not testet the performance on many connections. The test I did now was a single download using Internet Explorer as client. The machine I used (for server) is an old Pentium 3. It was not a big difference. I don't remember the filesize, but download takes about 40 seconds. V5 used about 3-4

Re: [twsocket] Slightly OT: How many of you agree that 2GB

2007-02-25 Thread Markus Humm
Hello, I'm not sure wether you know it or not, but with the new memory manager and some OS switch /3GB you can now use 3 GB instead of only two which may make the situation bearable just a little bit longer! Greetings Markus -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list

Re: [twsocket] Performance on the latest ICS V6

2007-02-25 Thread Arno Garrels
Bjørnar Nielsen wrote: I have not testet the performance on many connections. The test I did now was a single download using Internet Explorer as client. The machine I used (for server) is an old Pentium 3. It was not a big difference. I don't remember the filesize, but download takes

Re: [twsocket] Slightly OT: How many of you agree that 2GB

2007-02-25 Thread Arno Garrels
Markus Humm wrote: Hello, I'm not sure wether you know it or not, but with the new memory manager and some OS switch /3GB you can now use 3 GB instead of only two which may make the situation bearable just a little bit longer! But with the drawback that system space will be reduced from 2