Re: [twsocket] Help on ICS's HTTP client component

2006-11-11 Thread Francois PIETTE
> So that's the end of it. It's the server that's causing my troubles... Good to know. > Is it worth using different time-out's for different stages of > connection? Ex: use a long timeout for DNS queryes, use shorter timeout > for the connection itself, use long timeouts for data transmission it

Re: [twsocket] Help on ICS's HTTP client component

2006-11-11 Thread Cosmin Prund
Francois Piette wrote: > You should always implement timeout. Altough in your particular case, there > may be a problem somewhere else. Good to know! Is there a "magic number" for the default timeout? What should we use? Is it worth using different time-out's for different stages of connection?

Re: [twsocket] Help on ICS's HTTP client component

2006-11-10 Thread Francois Piette
CTED]> To: Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 3:13 PM Subject: [twsocket] Help on ICS's HTTP client component > Hello everyone. > > > Note: > This is a re-post of a message sent to the Talk list, with more detail > on the problem. This message gets sent the second time to t

[twsocket] Help on ICS's HTTP client component

2006-11-10 Thread Cosmin Prund
Hello everyone. Note: This is a re-post of a message sent to the Talk list, with more detail on the problem. This message gets sent the second time to this list too. I sent the first one before receiving elist's subscription confirmation so I don't think it went through. I'm having some trou