Re: [twsocket] OpenSSL hardware accelerators

2009-02-16 Thread Fastream Technologies
I got compiler errors when I last tried to integrate the avl cache! Can you send me a C++ example? Regards, SZ On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Arno Garrels arno.garr...@gmx.de wrote: Fastream Technologies wrote: Currently I get 20 SSL TPS local-to-local. When keep-alive is enabled, this

[twsocket] OpenSSL hardware accelerators

2009-02-15 Thread Fastream Technologies
Hello, Has anybody found the chance to test ICS-SSL on one of those? What's needed to make sure they (sw+hw) are cooperating? I think this issue is getting more and more important every day, agree? Currently I get 20 SSL TPS local-to-local. When keep-alive is enabled, this goes up to 2000. Best

Re: [twsocket] OpenSSL hardware accelerators

2009-02-15 Thread Paul
twsocket@elists.org Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 4:24 PM Subject: [twsocket] OpenSSL hardware accelerators Hello, Has anybody found the chance to test ICS-SSL on one of those? What's needed to make sure they (sw+hw) are cooperating? I think this issue is getting more and more important every

Re: [twsocket] OpenSSL hardware accelerators

2009-02-15 Thread Fastream Technologies
] OpenSSL hardware accelerators Hello, Has anybody found the chance to test ICS-SSL on one of those? What's needed to make sure they (sw+hw) are cooperating? I think this issue is getting more and more important every day, agree? Currently I get 20 SSL TPS local-to-local. When keep-alive

Re: [twsocket] OpenSSL hardware accelerators

2009-02-15 Thread Paul
Then this is a good but very expensive choise. The speed increase was visible. But the accelerator they have costs about 20.000 ? Paul -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at

Re: [twsocket] OpenSSL hardware accelerators

2009-02-15 Thread Arno Garrels
Fastream Technologies wrote: Currently I get 20 SSL TPS local-to-local. When keep-alive is enabled, this goes up to 2000. Do you use a SSL session cache, either the built-in OpenSSl session cache or (IMHO faster) the ICS AVL session cache? -- Arno Garrels -- To unsubscribe or change your

Re: [twsocket] OpenSSL hardware accelerators

2009-02-15 Thread Paul
Do you use a SSL session cache, either the built-in OpenSSl session cache or (IMHO faster) the ICS AVL session cache? Would that help for the keep-alives ? Paul btw: I can see the keep-alive (httpcli) working after 5 seconds and afterwards 2 times per second. -- To unsubscribe or change

Re: [twsocket] OpenSSL hardware accelerators

2009-02-15 Thread Arno Garrels
Paul wrote: Do you use a SSL session cache, either the built-in OpenSSl session cache or (IMHO faster) the ICS AVL session cache? Would that help for the keep-alives ? No, only with non-persistent connections since just the SSL handshake becomes faster. Paul btw: I can see the

Re: [twsocket] OpenSSL hardware accelerators

2009-02-15 Thread Paul
I don't understand? Last week, I got complaints about a user that there was too much traffic in wait state. The HttpCli checks for comands on a server, but if there is nothing available, the server keeps the connection open for 20s before answering. I checked the traffic between

Re: [twsocket] OpenSSL hardware accelerators

2009-02-15 Thread Arno Garrels
Paul wrote: I don't understand? Last week, I got complaints about a user that there was too much traffic in wait state. The HttpCli checks for comands on a server, OK, got it ;-) but if there is nothing available, the server keeps the connection open for 20s before answering. If

Re: [twsocket] OpenSSL hardware accelerators

2009-02-15 Thread Paul
Message - From: Arno Garrels arno.garr...@gmx.de To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 8:10 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] OpenSSL hardware accelerators Paul wrote: I don't understand? Last week, I got complaints about a user that there was too much traffic