Re: [twsocket] Don't trust routers!

2007-03-02 Thread Arno Garrels
: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "ICS support mailing" > Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 3:36 PM > Subject: Re: [twsocket] Don't trust routers! > > >> It's an idle time-out yes. >> >> Fastream Technologies wrote: >>&

Re: [twsocket] Don't trust routers!

2007-03-02 Thread Fastream Technologies
Perhaps the TCP connection has some end-to-end keep-alive packets sent which does not leave the stream "idle"? Regards, SZ - Original Message - From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ICS support mailing" Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 3:36 PM

Re: [twsocket] Don't trust routers!

2007-03-02 Thread Arno Garrels
It's an idle time-out yes. Fastream Technologies wrote: > We -in our code- implement/interpret a connection timeout as "idle > timeout". Could this be the case in Lancom as well? > > Best Regards, > > SZ > > - Original Message - > From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "ICS supp

Re: [twsocket] Don't trust routers!

2007-03-02 Thread Fastream Technologies
We -in our code- implement/interpret a connection timeout as "idle timeout". Could this be the case in Lancom as well? Best Regards, SZ - Original Message - From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ICS support mailing" Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 2:31 PM Subject: [twsocket] Don'