Re: [twsocket] Early web server response (OT)
I must apologize for the bizarre and annoying quoting and wrapping in some of my posts. When I respond from work I have no access to an SMTP server, so I must use my ISP's atrocious Web Mail system which hard-wraps everything at 76 characters (without Quoted-Printable soft-wraps) and distorts everthing. dZ. -- "Bastard Operators don't just win. Anyone can win. Bastard Operators win and totally demoralise. That's real winning." -- BOfH -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
Re: [twsocket] Early web server response [OT]
>> DZ-Jay said... >> coercing HTTP as the de facto standard protocol for all communications in the Internet (as a lot of people are trying to make it) is stupid. There are better transfer protocols out there. Preach it! The Commodore 64 implemented better protocols... ;) >> But this is a rant for another day. I tend to make that rant about five times a day. But, who's counting? ... :) Go DZ! -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
