Re: [twsocket] FTPClient speeds

2005-09-04 Thread Piotr Dałek
Hello! I wrote a write-buffering stream. Anyone interested? Adding read and seek support and extending it so it can write to other streams shouldn't be difficult. snip I thought windows buffered writes anyway? Is this so you can have a larger buffer or something completely different?

Re: [twsocket] FTPClient speeds

2005-08-30 Thread Dod
Also remember that if you use xDSL connection your upload bandwidth much smaller than download one. Is GET faster than PUT? In my tests GET performs seven times faster than PUT. FP Considering the transport, there is no reason to have a speed difference. Server caches files, is that the

Re: [twsocket] FTPClient speeds

2005-08-30 Thread Arno Garrels
Dod wrote: Also remember that if you use xDSL connection your upload bandwidth much smaller than download one. Yes I know, I was just wondering whether file caching can make such a big difference. BTW: I already suggested last year to write/implement a tiny buffered stream class, that would

Re: [twsocket] FTPClient speeds

2005-08-30 Thread Dod
Hello Arno, I could but...don't remember where is my stop-time watch I just bought around the corner to make it pause life-time for next 10 years :-) AG Dod wrote: Also remember that if you use xDSL connection your upload bandwidth much smaller than download one. AG Yes I know, I was just

Re: [twsocket] FTPClient speeds

2005-08-29 Thread Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd
Is GET faster than PUT? In my tests GET performs seven times faster than PUT. Server caches files, is that the reason? Yes, reading a file will always be much faster than writing one, particularly on a heavily loaded web server where much of the content is coming from memory, and stuff is