Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-14 Thread Arno Garrels
: Fastream Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 8:20 AM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) Here is the full log: FireFox 1.5.0.6: 13.09.2006 21:50:09 Connection Opened 13.09.2006 21:50:09

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-14 Thread Fastream Technologies
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) :I tested with Opera successfully! : : Change the format string below in order to get a hex display like: : raise Exception.CreateFmt('Init context failed: 0x%x', [Sec]); : : Post the hex value. : : : : Fastream Technologies wrote

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-14 Thread Fastream Technologies
mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 11:31 AM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) : It is very strange that when I enabled DEBUG_EXCEPTIONS, it worked and gave : no errors/exceptions! But I cannot deploy in this form... ;( : : SZ

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-14 Thread Fastream Technologies
: Fastream Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] : To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org : Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 11:31 AM : Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) : : :: It is very strange that when I enabled DEBUG_EXCEPTIONS, it worked and : gave :: no errors

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-14 Thread Arno Garrels
in OverbyteIcsNtlmSsp.pas as well as in OverbyteIcsSspi.pas. Regards, SZ - Original Message - From: Fastream Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 11:40 AM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) Hi

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-14 Thread Fastream Technologies
11:40 AM : Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) : : : Hi Arno, : : I also wonder if this could be a lifetime/time zone problem? We are : GMT+200. What is the timeout period of this authentication and did : you consider different time zones? : : Best Regards

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-14 Thread Arno Garrels
: Fastream Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 11:31 AM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) It is very strange that when I enabled DEBUG_EXCEPTIONS, it worked and gave no errors/exceptions

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-14 Thread Stadin, Benjamin
FS, can you try it with FF with the site added to the trusted URIs and NTLM auto-login enabled? -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-14 Thread Fastream Technologies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: twsocket@elists.org Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 12:37 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) : FS, can you try it with FF with the site added to the trusted URIs and NTLM : auto-login enabled? : : -- : To unsubscribe or change your

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-14 Thread Fastream Technologies
Now it gives SEC_E_LOGON_DENIED. :( Regards, SZ - Original Message - From: Fastream Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 12:30 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) : Hello, : : I

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-14 Thread Fastream Technologies
@elists.org Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 1:15 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) : Now it gives SEC_E_LOGON_DENIED. :( : : Regards, : : SZ : : - Original Message - : From: Fastream Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] : To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-14 Thread Arno Garrels
: Fastream Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 1:15 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) Now it gives SEC_E_LOGON_DENIED. :( Regards, SZ - Original Message - From

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-14 Thread Fastream Technologies
: Thursday, September 14, 2006 1:48 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) : Fastream Technologies wrote: : Latest report: when I used the Administrator account of Windows, it : worked! :) So I am beginning to think this is a problem with security : policies of some

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-14 Thread Maurizio Lotauro
Scrive Fastream Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Here is the full log: How are these logs created? I asked for ethereal logs because it decode the NTLM message, so we can see what domain and username will send by each client (you can do this yourself). Both browser asking for credential or

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-14 Thread Arno Garrels
://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html Regards, SZ - Original Message - From: Fastream Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 1:15 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) Now

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-14 Thread Fastream Technologies
- Original Message - From: Maurizio Lotauro [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 2:02 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) : Scrive Fastream Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED]: : : Here is the full log

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-14 Thread Arno Garrels
Arno Garrels wrote: Arno Garrels wrote: Fastream Technologies wrote: Latest report: when I used the Administrator account of Windows, it worked! :) So I am beginning to think this is a problem with security policies of some Windows. Yesterday I tested on a out-of-the-box, new XP SP2

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-14 Thread Fastream Technologies
Yes it is 0 here as well! - Original Message - From: Arno Garrels [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 2:13 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) : Arno Garrels wrote: : Arno Garrels wrote

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-14 Thread Maurizio Lotauro
Scrive Fastream Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Ethereal does not work on localhost!! I put together these logs using socketspy. I think that if you want to know if your application works you should reproduce a real environment. Will your reverse proxy run on a real server or on the same pc

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-14 Thread Fastream Technologies
: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) : Scrive Fastream Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED]: : : Ethereal does not work on localhost!! I put together these logs using : socketspy. : : I think that if you want to know if your application works you should : reproduce a real environment. Will your reverse

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-14 Thread Arno Garrels
- From: Arno Garrels [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 2:13 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) Arno Garrels wrote: Arno Garrels wrote: Fastream Technologies wrote: Latest report: when I used

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-14 Thread Arno Garrels
, 2006 2:33 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) Scrive Fastream Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Ethereal does not work on localhost!! I put together these logs using socketspy. I think that if you want to know if your application works you should

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-14 Thread Arno Garrels
- From: Fastream Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 1:15 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) Now it gives SEC_E_LOGON_DENIED. :( Regards, SZ - Original Message

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-14 Thread Fastream Technologies
: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) :I said that several times. You must at least have admin helper (I don't : remember what specific privileges are needed) rights to query the user db, : also if you want to auth in a domain your app must run as domain user with : sufficent

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-14 Thread Fastream Technologies
ยค : : - Original Message - : From: Stadin, Benjamin [EMAIL PROTECTED] : To: twsocket@elists.org : Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 3:05 PM : Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) : : ::I said that several times. You must at least have admin helper (I don't

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-14 Thread Fastream Technologies
Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 3:22 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) Basicallly the ntlmmessage = NULL where it must not be--ethereal calls this malformed header!!! Regards, SZ

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-14 Thread Arno Garrels
Fastream Technologies wrote: Basicallly the ntlmmessage = NULL where it must not be--ethereal calls this malformed header!!! Please, please, please upload the Ethereal dump in as a *.pcap file somewhere so we can open it with ethereal. -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-14 Thread Fastream Technologies
Here it is: http://www.fastream.com/ics/ntlm.pcap Regards, SZ - Original Message - From: Arno Garrels [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 3:36 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) : Fastream

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-14 Thread Arno Garrels
twsocket@elists.org Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 3:36 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) Fastream Technologies wrote: Basicallly the ntlmmessage = NULL where it must not be--ethereal calls this malformed header!!! Please, please, please upload

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-14 Thread Fastream Technologies
mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 3:57 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) NTLM requires Keep-Alive, but the server sends Connection: close in the header of 401Answer. Fastream Technologies wrote: Here it is: http://www.fastream.com

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-14 Thread Arno Garrels
? Best Regards, SZ - Original Message - From: Arno Garrels [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 3:57 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) NTLM requires Keep-Alive, but the server sends

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-14 Thread Fastream Technologies
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 4:05 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) : Fastream Technologies wrote: : Ah, ok. But how does NTLM works with HTTP/1.0 then? Is it 1.1 only? : : No it is not. Same as with digest that also works in my demo with 1.0. : : What

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-14 Thread Fastream Technologies
- From: Fastream Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 4:33 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) : Hello Arno, : : Seems cool now! http://www.fastream.net/beta/IQReverseProxy.exe (1.2b1). I

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-14 Thread Stadin, Benjamin
I don't think so. NTLM works fine for me in FF ever since. FF just fills data into an NTLM context struct and if the message is complete it is used. This has nothing to do with a state machine. And btw, I've looked at the Pascal code of this pslib, I think it's more a hack than a solution.

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-14 Thread Fastream Technologies
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 5:57 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) I don't think so. NTLM works fine for me in FF ever since. FF just fills data into an NTLM context struct and if the message is complete it is used. This has nothing to do with a state

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-14 Thread Stadin, Benjamin
: Stadin, Benjamin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: twsocket@elists.org Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 5:57 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) I don't think so. NTLM works fine for me in FF ever since. FF just fills data into an NTLM context struct and if the message

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-14 Thread Arno Garrels
Stadin, Benjamin wrote: FF has a function table for function calls to Windows' own secure32.dll / security.dll to provide SSPI functionality (also a good lesson in C programming, OverbyteIcsSspi as well ;-) this how the API works! --- Arno Garrels [TeamICS]

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Arno Garrels
Fastream Technologies wrote: It does not ask for domain then! BTW: Not all browsers provide a domain field in their auth-dialog! There's a boolean var Allow, set it to FALSE in order to reject the user. I thought this would look like a NT- log on screen!! How does it understand which

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Fastream Technologies
- Original Message - From: Arno Garrels [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 11:29 AM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) : Fastream Technologies wrote: : It does not ask for domain then! : : BTW

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Arno Garrels
Fastream Technologies wrote: - Original Message - From: Arno Garrels [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 11:29 AM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) Fastream Technologies wrote: It does

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Fastream Technologies
Please reply my private messages as well. Thanks, SZ - Original Message - From: Arno Garrels [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 12:01 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) : Fastream

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Arno Garrels
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 12:01 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) Fastream Technologies wrote: - Original Message - From: Arno Garrels [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 11:29

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Fastream Technologies
- Original Message - From: Arno Garrels [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 12:09 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) : Fastream Technologies wrote: : Please reply my private messages as well

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Fastream Technologies
] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 12:09 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) : Fastream Technologies wrote: : Please reply my private messages as well. : : This is plenty of C code, and I have to do my work as well! : I'll

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Fastream Technologies
, September 13, 2006 1:22 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) : Arno, : : I just tried with your demo.html and it gives the same problem! Please : refine your code under BCB personality (perhaps that's related?). It gives : no compile time error--just does not let

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Arno Garrels
with ethereal. Regards, SZ - Original Message - From: Arno Garrels [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 12:09 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) Fastream Technologies wrote

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Arno Garrels
are buggy. Check with ethereal! Best Regards, SZ - Original Message - From: Fastream Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 1:22 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) Arno

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Fastream Technologies
: : - Original Message - : From: Arno Garrels [EMAIL PROTECTED] : To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org : Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 12:09 PM : Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) : : : Fastream Technologies wrote: : Please reply my

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Arno Garrels
Fastream Technologies wrote: Please check my private message. Your EXE works fine using Firefox/1.5.0.6! Rgrds, SZ -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Fastream Technologies
I also tested with FF/1.5.0.6! Something's wrong somewhere! - Original Message - From: Arno Garrels [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 2:15 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) : Fastream

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Arno Garrels
@elists.org Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 2:15 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) Fastream Technologies wrote: Please check my private message. Your EXE works fine using Firefox/1.5.0.6! Rgrds, SZ -- To unsubscribe or change your settings

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Fastream Technologies
and there is no domain information--both not stated () and asked for! Best Regards, SZ - Original Message - From: Arno Garrels [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 2:31 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Arno Garrels
- Original Message - From: Arno Garrels [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 2:31 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) Fastream Technologies wrote: I also tested with FF/1.5.0.6

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Fastream Technologies
Did you try a non-80 port? Maybe that requires a domain in the header? - Original Message - From: Arno Garrels [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 4:36 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Fastream Technologies
twsocket@elists.org Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 4:38 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) : Did you try a non-80 port? Maybe that requires a domain in the header? : : - Original Message - : From: Arno Garrels [EMAIL PROTECTED] : To: ICS support mailing

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Arno Garrels
, 2006 4:36 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) Fastream Technologies wrote: Hello Arno and Everybody, Could you look at this screenshot carefully: http://www.fastream.com/ics/arnoscreenshot.png. This is Arno's demo compiled with BCB2k6 and running

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Fastream Technologies
, September 13, 2006 4:53 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) : Fastream Technologies wrote: : Did you try a non-80 port? : : No I haven't, have you tried the standard port? : : Maybe that requires a domain in the header? : : - Original Message - : From: Arno

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Arno Garrels
:53 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) Fastream Technologies wrote: Did you try a non-80 port? No I haven't, have you tried the standard port? Maybe that requires a domain in the header? - Original Message - From: Arno Garrels [EMAIL

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Fastream Technologies
, 2006 4:53 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) Fastream Technologies wrote: Did you try a non-80 port? No I haven't, have you tried the standard port? Maybe that requires a domain in the header? - Original Message - From: Arno Garrels [EMAIL

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Arno Garrels
Garrels [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 5:10 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) Fastream Technologies wrote: Ok. It is not related with port. One idea: my Windows username includes a space

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Arno Garrels
, September 13, 2006 4:53 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) Fastream Technologies wrote: Did you try a non-80 port? No I haven't, have you tried the standard port? Maybe that requires a domain in the header? - Original Message - From: Arno Garrels

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Fastream Technologies
- Original Message - From: Arno Garrels [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 5:59 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) Fastream Technologies wrote: Hello Arno and Francois, I cannot debug Arno's demo

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Arno Garrels
- Original Message - From: Arno Garrels [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 5:59 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) Fastream Technologies wrote: Hello Arno and Francois, I cannot

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Arno Garrels
: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 6:27 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) Fastream Technologies wrote: Hello, In this site: http://www.innovation.ch/personal/ronald/ntlm.html the domain names (both the HTTP and NTLM domains) are said to be transmitted

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Fastream Technologies
there. - Original Message - From: Arno Garrels [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 6:36 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) Fastream Technologies wrote: I do not believe the empty domain

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Fastream Technologies
@elists.org Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 6:48 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) Fastream Technologies wrote: I mean the base64 message not the HTTP header. I'll give it up soon... THIS IS A CLIENT ISSUE!! The same happens when you try to access a protected page

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Arno Garrels
: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 6:48 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) Fastream Technologies wrote: I mean the base64 message not the HTTP header. I'll give it up soon... THIS IS A CLIENT ISSUE!! The same happens when you try to access a protected page

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Fastream Technologies
Message - From: Arno Garrels [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 7:25 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) Fastream Technologies wrote: Ok, thank you for tolerating my insistence. I am trying

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Stadin, Benjamin
Normally you won't have a reason to use another domain, the server appplication uses the domain of the user account it is running with. Make sure your application is running with the domain account you want to use AND sufficent privileges (needed to query the user database). You have to give a

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Fastream Technologies
Thank you for the explanation Benjamin! I got it now. BTW, one note for others: Opera does not support NTLM. :( - Original Message - From: Stadin, Benjamin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: twsocket@elists.org Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 7:38 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Arno Garrels
Message - From: Arno Garrels [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 7:25 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) Fastream Technologies wrote: Ok, thank you for tolerating my insistence. I am trying

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Fastream Technologies
: Stadin, Benjamin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: twsocket@elists.org Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 7:38 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) : Normally you won't have a reason to use another domain, the server : appplication uses the domain of the user account

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Maurizio Lotauro
Scrive Fastream Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I think there is a misundestanding. Yes that's what the page says and I mean: the msg contains the domain BUT in your code, the FF displays domain as (null). That needs to be fixed. At least localhost or 127.0.0.1 should be displayed there.

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Arno Garrels
customers would complain if I deploy now, wrong? Regards, SZ - Original Message - From: Stadin, Benjamin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: twsocket@elists.org Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 7:38 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) Normally you won't

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Fastream Technologies
Ok. I am trying to understand why the FF does not work... - Original Message - From: Arno Garrels [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 8:05 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) : Fastream

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Stadin, Benjamin
Fastream Technologies schrieb: Arno, You have the option to enter the NTLM domain name in msg1 of NTLM (base64 encoded). That's what I mean. I'm not Arno but again, in the browser a domain is only specified in the form domain\user in the user field of the browser's login window *if* the

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Fastream Technologies
: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) : Scrive Fastream Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED]: : : [...] : : Second, I still cannot get the FF to work. I believe this is an issue at : least some customers would complain if I deploy now, wrong? : : But does IE work? In that case compare the log made

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Fastream Technologies
PROTECTED] : To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org : Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 9:06 PM : Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) : : :: Scrive Fastream Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED]: :: :: [...] :: :: Second, I still cannot get the FF to work. I believe

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Fastream Technologies
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 10:46 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) : To sum up: we have just one bug/problem left. It is the FF compatibility and : with IE it works fine now. However, Arno claims the code runs well on his : FF1.5.0.6 but the same browser

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Maurizio Lotauro
Scrive Fastream Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello, Here is the problematic FF log: [...] A file version would be better, and of both browser. The IE6 response has a different WWW-authenticate. If NTLM is like Digest, then they should not be expected to be similar anyway (due to

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

2006-09-13 Thread Fastream Technologies
Here is the full log: FireFox 1.5.0.6: 13.09.2006 21:50:09 Connection Opened 13.09.2006 21:50:09 From Local GET / HTTP/1.1..Host: fastream.homeip.net:82..User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.6) Gecko/20060728 Firefox/1.5.0.6..Accept: