Re: [twsocket] Proposal for new feature in OverbyteIcsSmtpProt.pas

2008-03-26 Thread DZ-Jay
Hello: I don't think this is necessary. First, this headers should be handled by the application (and indeed can easily be done as you pointed out). Second, there is a conventional X-Loop header used and supported by many MTAs.

Re: [twsocket] Proposal for new feature in OverbyteIcsSmtpProt.pas

2008-03-26 Thread Bjørnar Nielsen
:07 To: ICS support mailing Subject: Re: [twsocket] Proposal for new feature in OverbyteIcsSmtpProt.pas Hello: I don't think this is necessary. First, this headers should be handled by the application (and indeed can easily be done as you pointed out). Second, there is a conventional X

Re: [twsocket] Proposal for new feature in OverbyteIcsSmtpProt.pas

2008-03-26 Thread DZ-Jay
Bjørnar Nielsen wrote: I did not know of this header-field. Why not add properties for both? The xautogeneratedreply works for my purpose and the mailservers I have testet against. Regards Bjørnar Well, because delivery loops are a server problem, and a mail user agent not only should

Re: [twsocket] Proposal for new feature in OverbyteIcsSmtpProt.pas

2008-03-26 Thread Bjørnar Nielsen
: [twsocket] Proposal for new feature in OverbyteIcsSmtpProt.pas Bjørnar Nielsen wrote: I did not know of this header-field. Why not add properties for both? The xautogeneratedreply works for my purpose and the mailservers I have testet against. Regards Bjørnar Well, because delivery loops