> Both MsgWaitForMultpleObjects and Sleep seriously slow down a program
> that's trying to do multiple jobs at the same time.
Maybe you are referring to the first use I made of MsgWaitForMultpleObjects.
Since then, I have changed the order in the code and now there is no more
slow down, imo.
--
[
> Do you say that you are convinced MsgWaitForMultpleObjects() is faster
> than Sleep()and ProcessMessages; ;-)
Both MsgWaitForMultpleObjects and Sleep seriously slow down a program
that's
trying to do multiple jobs at the same time.
Angus
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TW
Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd wrote:
>> However the speed depends of course, if you have just a single
>> instance, it makes no difference, but how do you realize multiple,
>> concurrent i.e. FTP-dowloads in sync mode? You would have to go
>> multithreaded, pooled or
>> one thread per conne
