[ The Types Forum (announcements only),
http://lists.seas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/types-announce ]
Request for comments: Two-phase reviewing for POPL
... no decision process is perfect The POPL Steering Committee
has formulated the following
[ The Types Forum (announcements only),
http://lists.seas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/types-announce ]
A quick 2 cents on one of Mike Mislove's comments:
Given this disparity, the number of papers accepted could be increased
by holding poster sessions, as Prakash suggests, but I have
[ The Types Forum (announcements only),
http://lists.seas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/types-announce ]
Precisely: the key word is IDEAS, not papers.
The hiring and tenure committees should look for, and perhaps count,
IDEAS, not papers, especially if at conferences. And the conferences
[ The Types Forum (announcements only),
http://lists.seas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/types-announce ]
Many thanks to Simon and everyone else who has posted in
this thread for their thoughtful comments.
The POPL Steering Committee has considered whether to increase
the number of papers
[ The Types Forum (announcements only),
http://lists.seas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/types-announce ]
After reading many of the thoughtful responses, I thought it might be
worthwhile to add a few further remarks:
1. Mostly, I am against the ever-increasing officiousness of the
