Re: [U-Boot] help

2009-01-07 Thread dinny
For SoCs, it depends on how the system design intends to make use of the two processors. If the design intends to use them as AMP, you should run u-boot for each processor in sequence to init their peripherals. In this case, you can adapt u-boot deriving from the openzoom source. If as SMP, you

Re: [U-Boot] help

2009-01-07 Thread Naveen Kumar GADDIPATI
Hi dinny, At the uboot level,we will confgiure only one core to boot up the image but we use two cores.For this usecase, could we use the single cortex-A8 uboot source code? Regards, Naveen -Original Message- From: dinny [mailto:dinny...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009

Re: [U-Boot] help

2009-01-07 Thread dinny
From the cpu aspect, it should be the most familiar one with your CPUs. And try to learn more on your on-board peripherals and devices. Probably you can find some boards that have similar device configuration, thus you can reuse some codes, esp. in case that you should be not familiar with these

Re: [U-Boot] MPC8548 not able to detect Marvell 88E1145 PHY

2009-01-07 Thread Ajeesh Kumar
Hi Andy, Thanks for your info. This points to a hardware problem. Do you have an oscilloscope? Take a look at the MDIO pin, and see what's being sent, and what the reply is. The protocol for MDIO is pretty simple. Make sure that the address on the read request is good, and make sure that

Re: [U-Boot] help

2009-01-07 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear dinny, In message 5e4d16e90901070137j5695a0e2ye50b3f558c9ef...@mail.gmail.com you wrote: From the cpu aspect, it should be the most familiar one with your CPUs. And try to learn more on your on-board peripherals and devices. ... On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Naveen Kumar GADDIPATI

[U-Boot] Directory of surgeons etc..

2009-01-07 Thread dontsendemailhere
Practicing Physicians in the US Doctor in over 36 specialties 16 different sortable fields Price for new customers - $396 +++ Also you will get this data below with your purchase: ++ Dentists -- Hospitals ++ Pharmaceutical Companies -- Medical Equipment Suppliers Email us at::

Re: [U-Boot] help

2009-01-07 Thread dinny
Hi Denk, On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote: Can you please stop top-posting / full-quoting? Sure, I corrected it once I had known. Best Regards Dinny -- what we need is passion, chance, and companions. ___ U-Boot

Re: [U-Boot] Fw: TFTP fails when using network switch

2009-01-07 Thread Loren A. Linden Levy
Hi All, Is there something like ethtool in U-boot that I can use to see what the network negotiated too. This is a fairly cheap netgear switch so I do not have any diagnostics on it. I will also have a look with wireshark when i get back to the lab to see if I can identify what is happening.

Re: [U-Boot] help

2009-01-07 Thread dinny
Thanks for ur updates. This topic seems interesting:-) On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 9:37 PM, Nishanth Menon menon.nisha...@gmail.com wrote: One thing that might be different would be mmu config I would suspect.. you may want to refer to [2] instead of omapzoom as [2] is closer to mainline u-boot.

Re: [U-Boot] help

2009-01-07 Thread Nishanth Menon
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 8:12 AM, dinny dinny...@gmail.com wrote: [1] http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.ddi0344e/index.html - there is a link to A9 also nearby.. It seems A9's doc is public-restricted, and it prevents me from having a look at A9's design. Could you

[U-Boot] RV: Question about U-Boot for MPC5121

2009-01-07 Thread Marco Donadio
Good morning, our team is working on a new telematic platform using MPC5121 device. Our Boar has some features of ADS512101 evaluacion board. We are not familiar with boot loader system because it's the first time that we develop a board based on operating system. We need some basic help

Re: [U-Boot] RV: Question about U-Boot for MPC5121

2009-01-07 Thread Jerry Van Baren
Marco Donadio wrote: Good morning, our team is working on a new telematic platform using MPC5121 device. Our Boar has some features of ADS512101 evaluacion board. Good. You have a starting point. We are not familiar with boot loader system because it's the first time that we develop a

Re: [U-Boot] MPC8548 not able to detect Marvell 88E1145 PHY

2009-01-07 Thread Andy Fleming
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 3:54 AM, Ajeesh Kumar aje...@tataelxsi.co.in wrote: Hi Andy, Thanks for your info. This points to a hardware problem. Do you have an oscilloscope? Take a look at the MDIO pin, and see what's being sent, and what the reply is. The protocol for MDIO is pretty simple.

Re: [U-Boot] Fw: TFTP fails when using network switch

2009-01-07 Thread Ben Warren
Loren A. Linden Levy wrote: Hi All, Is there something like ethtool in U-boot that I can use to see what the network negotiated too. This is a fairly cheap netgear switch so I do not have any diagnostics on it. I will also have a look with wireshark when i get back to the lab to see if I

[U-Boot] [RFC/PATCH 0/4] Add multi-chips support for NAND, FSL-UPM and TQM8548

2009-01-07 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
The following patch series intends to support the Micron multi-chip NAND device MT29F8G08FAB on the TQM8548 modules from TQ-Components. It makes sense to offer such a multi-chip device as one single device to the user. Multi-chip devices seem already be supported by the NAND layer, but U-Boot

[U-Boot] [RFC/PATCH 1/4] Enable multi chip support in the NAND layer

2009-01-07 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
This patch adds support for NAND_MAX_CHIPS to the MTD NAND layer. Multi-chip devices are then displayed as shown: Device 0: 2x NAND 512MiB 3,3V 8-bit, sector size 128 KiB Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com --- common/cmd_nand.c | 10 +-

[U-Boot] [RFC/PATCH 2/4] Add multi chip support to the UPM-FSL driver

2009-01-07 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
This patch adds support for multi-chip NAND devices to the FSL-UPM driver. The dev_ready callback of the struct fsl_upm_nand is now called with the argument chip_nr to allow testing the proper chip select line. This requires various BSPs to be updated appropriately and I will provide proper

[U-Boot] [RFC/PATCH 3/4] Add support for TQM-specific chip select logic to UPM-FSL

2009-01-07 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
For the NAND chips on the TQM8548 modules, a special chip-select logic is used. It uses dedicated address lines to be controlled via UPM machine address register (mar). This patch adds corresponding support to the FSL-UPM driver. Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com ---

[U-Boot] [RFC/PATCH 4/4] Add multi-chip NAND support for the TQM8548 modules

2009-01-07 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
This patches configures the NAND UPM-FSL driver with multi-chip support for the Micro MT29F8G08FAB on the TQM8548 modules. Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com --- board/tqc/tqm85xx/nand.c |2 ++ include/configs/TQM85xx.h |4 ++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2

Re: [U-Boot] Fw: TFTP fails when using network switch

2009-01-07 Thread Ulf Samuelsson
ons 2009-01-07 klockan 07:52 -0500 skrev Jerry Van Baren: Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Ulf Samuelsson, In message 1231282371.32308.276.ca...@elrond.atmel.com you wrote: It was tracked down to the autoconfiguration of the Ethernet PHY, so one of the PHYs ended up in 100 Mbps Half

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] spi/atmel: add AT45DB321D support

2009-01-07 Thread Ulf Samuelsson
tis 2009-01-06 klockan 14:48 -0800 skrev Brad Bozarth: Hmm... looking in the datasheet I have, it says: Flexible Erase Options – Page Erase (512 Bytes) – Block Erase (4 Kbytes) – Sector Erase (64 Kbytes) – Chip Erase (32 Mbits) The dataflash is normally 528/1056 bytes per page. D versions

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] ARM: Add/Improve support for Atmel AT91RM9200DK/E

2009-01-07 Thread Ulf Samuelsson
ons 2009-01-07 klockan 02:11 +0100 skrev Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD: Ulf Pink Boy please take a look on Thanks, I saw you committed part of the stuff I provided to the AT91 branch. FYI: Your patch to at91rm9200dk, disabling the dataflash is wrong. There is a 2 MB NOR flash *and* an 8

Re: [U-Boot] Fw: TFTP fails when using network switch

2009-01-07 Thread Jerry Van Baren
Ulf Samuelsson wrote: ons 2009-01-07 klockan 07:52 -0500 skrev Jerry Van Baren: Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Ulf Samuelsson, In message 1231282371.32308.276.ca...@elrond.atmel.com you wrote: It was tracked down to the autoconfiguration of the Ethernet PHY, so one of the PHYs ended up in 100

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] ARM: Add command to control coloured led from the console

2009-01-07 Thread Ulf Samuelsson
This patch allows any board implementing the coloured LED API to control the LEDs from the console. led [green | yellow | red | all ] [ on | off ] or led [ 1 | 2 | 3 | all ] [ on | off ] Adds configuration item CONFIG_CMD_LED enabling the command. The coloured led API is available as part

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] ARM: Add/Improve support for Atmel AT91RM9200DK/E

2009-01-07 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 20:55 Wed 07 Jan , Ulf Samuelsson wrote: ons 2009-01-07 klockan 02:11 +0100 skrev Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD: Ulf Pink Boy please take a look on Thanks, I saw you committed part of the stuff I provided to the AT91 branch. FYI: Your patch to at91rm9200dk, disabling the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] ARM: Add/Improve support for Atmel AT91RM9200DK/E

2009-01-07 Thread Ulf Samuelsson
ons 2009-01-07 klockan 02:11 +0100 skrev Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD: Ulf Pink Boy please take a look on http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-at91.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/mm You are aware that moving from the Atmel flash driver to the CFI driver means that the board support is

[U-Boot] new dataflash_mmc_mux command in u-boot-at91.git

2009-01-07 Thread Ulf Samuelsson
This command will allow the user to select if the SD-card controller (mci) or the SPI is available on the Multimedia card connector on the at91rm9200ek/dk. I think that the name is a little too specific and would like to have it changed to a more generic name. Today, we only have it for these

[U-Boot] [ANNOUNCE] DATAFLASH DRIVER

2009-01-07 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
Hi, The AT91 arch use a at45 driver design to be show as a parallel flash but it's a spi flash. Haavard add a new spi flash framework which support the dataflash so the current driver is mark as *depracated* and plan to be remove New board and cpu must

Re: [U-Boot] env_nand malloc not released

2009-01-07 Thread Scott Wood
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 12:03:48PM -0700, Derek Ou wrote: Hi, all, In the common/env_nand.c, function env_relocate_spec (for CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET_REDUND) malloc two memory areas in line 296 and 297. If it hits line 308 when both environment areas not found, it will return without freeing

Re: [U-Boot] [ANNOUNCE] DATAFLASH DRIVER

2009-01-07 Thread Ulf Samuelsson
ons 2009-01-07 klockan 21:56 +0100 skrev Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD: Hi, The AT91 arch use a at45 driver design to be show as a parallel flash but it's a spi flash. Haavard add a new spi flash framework which support the dataflash so the current driver is

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] ARM: Add/Improve support for Atmel AT91RM9200DK/E

2009-01-07 Thread Ulf Samuelsson
ons 2009-01-07 klockan 21:42 +0100 skrev Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD: On 21:37 Wed 07 Jan , Ulf Samuelsson wrote: ons 2009-01-07 klockan 02:11 +0100 skrev Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD: Ulf Pink Boy please take a look on

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Fix Freescale link scripts for newer GCCs

2009-01-07 Thread Matthew L. Creech
This addresses the problem described here: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2008-December/045029.html This changes the link scripts of several of the mpcXXX CPUs to include everything from '.rodata'. Without this, using a recent powerpc-linux-gnu toolchain (e.g. from CodeSourcery) to build

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] ARM: Add/Improve support for Atmel AT91RM9200DK/E

2009-01-07 Thread Ulf Samuelsson
ons 2009-01-07 klockan 21:04 +0100 skrev Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD: On 20:55 Wed 07 Jan , Ulf Samuelsson wrote: ons 2009-01-07 klockan 02:11 +0100 skrev Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD: Ulf Pink Boy please take a look on Thanks, I saw you committed part of the

[U-Boot] ads5121 cygwin build

2009-01-07 Thread Jeff Smith
I have built u-boot-2008.10 for the ads5121 (from the latest LTIB sources) under WindowsXP in cygwin. If anyone is interested I have a set of patches and some instructions. ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] mpc83xx: Add PCI-E support for MPC8315ERDB boards

2009-01-07 Thread Anton Vorontsov
MPC8315ERDB boards features PCI-E x1 and Mini PCI-E x1 ports. Let's support them. Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov avoront...@ru.mvista.com --- board/freescale/mpc8315erdb/mpc8315erdb.c | 52 + include/configs/MPC8315ERDB.h | 21 +++ 2 files

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] mpc83xx: Add PCI-E support for MPC837XEMDS boards

2009-01-07 Thread Anton Vorontsov
MPC837XEMDS boards can support PCI-E via PCI-E riser card. The card provides two PCI-E (x2) ports. Though, only one port can be used in x2 mode. Two ports can function simultaneously in x1 mode. PCI-E x1/x2 modes can be switched via pex_x2 environment variable. Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] mpc83xx: Add support for MPC83xx PCI-E controllers

2009-01-07 Thread Anton Vorontsov
This patch adds support for MPC83xx PCI-E controllers in Root Complex mode. The patch is based on Tony Li and Dave Liu work[1]. Though unlike the original patch, by default we don't register PCI-E buses for use in U-Boot, we only configure the controllers for future use in other OSes (Linux).

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] mpc83xx: Add PCI-E support for MPC8315ERDB boards

2009-01-07 Thread Anton Vorontsov
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 04:26:17AM +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote: [...] +#define CONFIG_SYS_PCIE1_BASE0xA000 +#define CONFIG_SYS_PCIE1_MEM_BASE0xA000 +#define CONFIG_SYS_PCIE1_MEM_PHYS0xA000 +#define CONFIG_SYS_PCIE1_MEM_SIZE0x1000 +#define

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] mpc83xx: Add PCI-E support for MPC8315ERDB boards

2009-01-07 Thread Liu Dave
MPC8315ERDB boards features PCI-E x1 and Mini PCI-E x1 ports. Let's support them. Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov avoront...@ru.mvista.com Acked-by: Dave Liu dave...@freescale.com ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] mpc83xx: Add PCI-E support for MPC837XEMDS boards

2009-01-07 Thread Liu Dave
+ /* Deassert the resets in the control register */ + out_be32(sysconf-pecr1, 0xE0008000); + if (!pex2) + out_be32(sysconf-pecr2, 0xE0008000); + udelay(2000); + + /* Configure PCI Express Local Access Windows */ + out_be32(pcie_law[0].bar,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] mpc83xx: Add support for MPC83xx PCI-E controllers

2009-01-07 Thread Liu Dave
This patch adds support for MPC83xx PCI-E controllers in Root Complex mode. The patch is based on Tony Li and Dave Liu work[1]. Though unlike the original patch, by default we don't register PCI-E buses for use in U-Boot, we only configure the controllers for future use in other OSes

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] mpc83xx: Add support for MPC83xx PCI-E controllers

2009-01-07 Thread Huang Changming
+static void mpc83xx_pcie_register_hose(int bus, struct pci_region *reg, +u8 link) +{ + extern void disable_addr_trans(void); /* start.S */ + static struct pci_controller pcie_hose[PCIE_MAX_BUSES]; If PCIe use the hose which is different from PCI

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] mpc83xx: Add support for MPC83xx PCI-E controllers

2009-01-07 Thread Liu Dave
+static void mpc83xx_pcie_register_hose(int bus, struct pci_region *reg, + u8 link) +{ + extern void disable_addr_trans(void); /* start.S */ + static struct pci_controller pcie_hose[PCIE_MAX_BUSES]; If PCIe use the hose which is different from PCI